Jump to content

Think I Found The Perfect Solution For Map Voting


10 replies to this topic

#1 Rhialto

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • 2,084 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationQuébec, QC - CANADA

Posted 18 November 2015 - 02:36 PM

Everytime someone change their initial vote, they lose a multiplier.

The way I see it, people should initially vote for their favorite combo but since the introduction of multiplier, people change their vote often, mostly at last second to get multiplier bonus.

With this solution, people will vote for the combo they really want and stick to it. You lose? Then your next vote will weight more until you finally win.

#2 Glucose

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 286 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 02:37 PM

What about 1 vote.

#3 Rhialto

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • 2,084 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationQuébec, QC - CANADA

Posted 18 November 2015 - 02:39 PM

What do you mean?

#4 WarHippy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,836 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 02:41 PM

Doesn't really help if you are still forced to play modes you do not like.

#5 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 18 November 2015 - 02:46 PM

Again, that's just more complexity when the easiest, fastest, and fairest solution is still random map and game mode selection.

#6 Adamski

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 1,071 posts
  • LocationCanada

Posted 18 November 2015 - 03:10 PM

It would be nice if each players profile listed all the map drop %.

Then the matchmaker adds up all the map drop %, and picks the least played maps as the choices.

#7 Mechwarrior Buddah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,459 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 18 November 2015 - 04:16 PM

perfect solution? remove it

#8 Hotthedd

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The People's Hero
  • 3,213 posts
  • LocationDixie

Posted 18 November 2015 - 04:50 PM

There is no reason to be able to change your vote.

#9 FinnMcKool

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,600 posts
  • Locationunknown

Posted 18 November 2015 - 04:58 PM

What was perfect , was what it was before, if you want a mode pick it, if you dont want a mode deselect it.

What is the problem with this, everyone is happy when they and the rest of the players are all playing what they like.

I dont want to make you play a mode you dont want to play , and I hope you feel the same way, why must PGI do this?

All its doing is making some quit , others play what they dont like , and the few who enjoy making others miserable or just want to ruin the game are the only winners.

#10 Jman5

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 4,914 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 05:07 PM

I have found that people who try to game the votes at the last second more often than not wind up screwing themselves into selecting their least favorite map. I have seen so many Terra Therma and Forest Colonies lately.

#11 Rhialto

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • 2,084 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationQuébec, QC - CANADA

Posted 18 November 2015 - 05:25 PM

View PostHotthedd, on 18 November 2015 - 04:50 PM, said:

There is no reason to be able to change your vote.

That was my first idea also and Russ replied this. I don't think it will solve the problem as people will still change their vote but just before the lock happens (when 6 seconds is displayed).

People switching constantly to get more weight next time is the problem to solve for now.

Another solution would be to still permit change like it is now but lose all multipliers. This would kind of force people to vote only for which map and mode they want and let the timer reach 0. That way the weight system will serve them sooner or later.

Edited by Rhialto, 18 November 2015 - 05:29 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users