

Umm... processor?
#1
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:40 PM
So either they ment the i5-2500 or i3-2200.
If someone can tell me which one they MENT, that would be nice. Speculations dont help, i want a definitive answer.
#2
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:46 PM
Seriously though, you know as much as the rest of us.
#3
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:46 PM
#4
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:48 PM
Edited by BenEEeees VAT GROWN BACON, 18 June 2012 - 06:03 PM.
#5
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:49 PM
#6
Posted 18 June 2012 - 06:01 PM
#7
Posted 18 June 2012 - 06:06 PM
#8
Posted 18 June 2012 - 06:10 PM
trycksh0t, on 18 June 2012 - 06:01 PM, said:
AMD does not have anything that comes close to sandy bridge performance. (as unfortunate as bulldozer turned out to be)
its also a quad.
#9
Posted 18 June 2012 - 06:12 PM
#10
Posted 18 June 2012 - 06:15 PM
#11
Posted 20 June 2012 - 10:16 PM
Vashts1985, on 18 June 2012 - 06:10 PM, said:
AMD does not have anything that comes close to sandy bridge performance. (as unfortunate as bulldozer turned out to be)
its also a quad.
Correction: AMD does not have anything that comes close to sandy bridge performance in lightly threaded tasks. The AMD FX-8150 runs just below the i7-2600k in multithreaded performance... while costing a good bit ($120) less. (internet retail values)
Strisk, on 18 June 2012 - 06:15 PM, said:
The i3 is hyperthreaded which makes it somewhat act like a quad core, and with it's high IPC it is more than a match for a low end Athalon II X4 in multithread.
Edited by Vulpesveritas, 20 June 2012 - 10:16 PM.
#12
Posted 20 June 2012 - 10:25 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users