Jump to content

Ams Module Upgrade


23 replies to this topic

#21 TVMA Doc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 342 posts
  • LocationThe People's Demokratik Socialist Republik of Kalifornistan

Posted 28 February 2013 - 04:56 PM

View PostGlythe, on 25 February 2013 - 02:49 AM, said:

How about we have a module that upgrades AMS?

Level 1 upgrades AMS to shoot down streaks more effectively (removing the 150m minimum range).

Level 2 upgrades AMS tracking against LRMs and increases range by 15% (overall shooting down about 20% more missiles).


ECM weighs the same as AMS but anyone that can carry ECM will ALWAYS replace AMS with ECM. That says to me AMS needs a buff so that it is still a viable choice instead of something you will always replace if possible.

Not entirely true. I have an AMS launcher as well as ECM on my Raven 3L and my Atlas D-DC. There is always a use for AMS for the other members of your team that aren't benefitted by the ECM bubble or for when your ECM is down due to PPC attack. It may be a bit of a waste of tonnage, but 3 tons between the two doesn't seem extreme given the pain that uncountered LRMs may cause.

#22 Corvus Antaka

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 8,310 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationInner Sphere

Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:44 PM

AMS is fine. whats funny is that "nurf LRM" threads are making a comeback, most pilots seem to have forgotten about using cover & AMS with the ECM madness, now with alpine the LRM whine has returned.

#23 Glythe

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,566 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 07:22 AM

I really don't think AMS is fine considering how many people leave it out of their build (even on mechs 65 tons ore more).

This isn't a LRM whine thread. It's a discussion about how AMS could be improved.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users