51 replies to this topic

[Kazly]

I'm sorry. As soon as I saw "Now we gt CC in game" or whatever, I had to stop reading.

Glad your thinking/contributing and such (probably more than me)- but for some reason I almost find that offensive in the MWO universe. Maybe because I correlate CC w/ dungeons, who knows.

[The Silent Protagonist]

OP is a pretty good guy, these suggestions make sense to me. Not sure about the ECM affecting both sides because it does seem a little OTT in my opinion, but I agree that BAP should be able to pierce ECM. I also support the flamer suggestion, as I want to chuck flamers on my death snail and tickle everyones buttocks like the sniggering pervert I am.

[WolvesX]

Kazly, on 28 February 2013 - 02:25 PM, said:

I'm sorry. As soon as I saw "Now we gt CC in game" or whatever, I had to stop reading.

Glad your thinking/contributing and such (probably more than me)- but for some reason I almost find that offensive in the MWO universe. Maybe because I correlate CC w/ dungeons, who knows.

Have you read the first 3 books of battletech the "Grey Death Legion Saga" so to say. They use heat weapons in exactly that way.

[WolvesX]

Lt XKalibur, on 28 February 2013 - 02:37 PM, said:

OP is a pretty good guy, these suggestions make sense to me. Not sure about the ECM affecting both sides because it does seem a little OTT in my opinion, but I agree that BAP should be able to pierce ECM. I also support the flamer suggestion, as I want to chuck flamers on my death snail and tickle everyones buttocks like the sniggering pervert I am.

The both sides thingy is just one of many ideas, it just made sense to me in a BT / MW game as I read my old books again, in which thay work that way.

[Bishop Steiner]

WolvesX, on 28 February 2013 - 02:21 PM, said:

The bigger the options, the more fun is the game.

UAC5 would stille be better (4.55 and more with df), but AC5 would be also viable.


I have no easy solution to the whole SRM6x6 cat or SRMs in general. Very hard to balance in my humble opinion.

Yeah.... instead of damage or chassis nerfs... I wonder if a simple increase of heat, 1-2 pts, would work? It wouldn't make too much difference on the designs a that only carry 1-3 launchers, but would seriously add to the burn with a 6 pack, I would think?

[WolvesX]

Bishop Steiner, on 28 February 2013 - 02:59 PM, said:

Yeah.... instead of damage or chassis nerfs... I wonder if a simple increase of heat, 1-2 pts, would work? It wouldn't make too much difference on the designs a that only carry 1-3 launchers, but would seriously add to the burn with a 6 pack, I would think?

Good thought! Seems a viable idea, since SRM are CQC weapons and heat matters that big time.

But I got no final opinion about this idea yet, but it sounds very resonable.

Edited by WolvesX, 28 February 2013 - 03:03 PM.

[Tickdoff Tank]

The UAC currently has a ROF of 1.1, and the AC5 has a ROF of 1.7. They should change the UAC5 and AC5 to both have a ROF of 1.4 and allow the UAC to double tap with a chance of jam. That makes the UAC better than the AC5, but also gives the AC5 a buff that it needs.

[WolvesX]

Tickdoff Tank, on 28 February 2013 - 03:13 PM, said:

The UAC currently has a ROF of 1.1, and the AC5 has a ROF of 1.7. They should change the UAC5 and AC5 to both have a ROF of 1.4 and allow the UAC to double tap with a chance of jam. That makes the UAC better than the AC5, but also gives the AC5 a buff that it needs.

You shouldn't forget crit, ammo and tons.

UAC -> less ammo, 1 + ton

[Team Leader]

I dont understand what the proposed nerf is for ECM? Can you explain a little bit?

Edited by Team Leader, 28 February 2013 - 03:40 PM.

[WolvesX]

LoL so many "easy fix" theads after I started this one =)

[WolvesX]

schlaepf81, on 28 February 2013 - 10:03 AM, said:

MG: Buffing to bring them in between small and med laser. LIKE
Flamer: more heat. less heat...doesnt matter. let it be plasma, directly coming from the reactor and melt down your enemy. ultrashort range "ppc-mg" 2dps 3hps



and why is that so?

Ahahha nice one schleapf =)

WHAT MWO REALLY NEEDS: PPC MG

Edited by WolvesX, 28 February 2013 - 04:19 PM.

[WolvesX]

Team Leader, on 28 February 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:

I dont understand what the proposed nerf is for ECM? Can you explain a little bit?

If ECM is on, it jammes everyone inside 180m friends and team mates.

[Kiiyor]

WolvesX, on 28 February 2013 - 09:31 AM, said:

Flamer -> Increase the heatgeneration by A LOT, like x8 or x6 times and screw the crit. Here is your stun.

Now we got CC in game and a usefull flamer. It now can seriously lower the enemy DPS, if your target uses energy or rockets.

STUNLOCK MECH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

[WolvesX]

Kiiyor, on 28 February 2013 - 08:51 PM, said:

STUNLOCK MECH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

Have fun, you won't do any damage. Your range is 64m. wow.

Edited by WolvesX, 28 February 2013 - 10:07 PM.

[Kiiyor]

WolvesX, on 28 February 2013 - 10:07 PM, said:

Have fun, you won't do any damage. Your range is 64m. wow.

It wasn't.. I... sigh.

[WolvesX]

Kiiyor, on 01 March 2013 - 12:51 AM, said:

It wasn't.. I... sigh.

I just wanted to make this point totaly clear, you where joking, but some may take it serious.

[Moromillas]

If only it were that simple.

[WolvesX]

Moromillas, on 01 March 2013 - 03:18 AM, said:

If only it were that simple.

Isn't it ?

[Moromillas]

WolvesX, on 01 March 2013 - 04:03 AM, said:

Isn't it ?

lol. No, not really.

[WolvesX]

Moromillas, on 01 March 2013 - 04:26 AM, said:

lol. No, not really.

Don't think so proof me wrong.