59 replies to this topic

[Enig]

Listen to us, we don't agree with this potential design decision regarding consumables.

LISTEN TO US.

EDIT: To be clear, I'd be find if the CBill and MC consumables were identical. But they're not.

Edited by Enig, 04 March 2013 - 06:44 PM.

[Wingbreaker]

Enig, on 04 March 2013 - 05:58 PM, said:

Listen to us, we don't agree with this potential design decision regarding consumables.

LISTEN TO US.

Seriously, please stop posting these. It's pointless. You're going to be cruising for a ban.

Edited by Wingbreaker, 04 March 2013 - 06:00 PM.

[Damion Sparhawk]

how about, rather than bitching about something that isn't even activated, you wait and see how it's implimented? just a thought.

[Mystere]

Reported.

[Markus Haelur]

I have to agree. Why lock out the thread when it is plain to see that to get the best set up is to pay with real money. I have been a big defender that PGI has not made this game P2W. but I feel this is a little much...

[Synaps3]

How about you post in the existing threads rather than making new ones to be locked?

You pay them $300 and they have to pay $50000 to hire a new staffer to delete all the forum spam you're making. Not worth it.

Delete thread please.

Edited by Synaps3, 04 March 2013 - 06:02 PM.

[Chavette]

Damion Sparhawk, on 04 March 2013 - 06:00 PM, said:

how about, rather than bitching about something that isn't even activated, you wait and see how it's implimented? just a thought.

Not alot to wait for here, its written down % for % on the command chair post, and the air strike stuff is probably gonna be even worse.

[zrap]

well, while i don't like the direction this is taking with the MC vs CB consumables, simply demanding stuff will not help.

The only thing that will help is just dont spend a single MC on it, and it may change if enough people act that way.
think about the colors, I think a lot of people did the same there, until there was the option for at least permanent colors.

[Zanathan]

Markus Haelur, on 04 March 2013 - 06:01 PM, said:

I have to agree. Why lock out the thread when it is plain to see that to get the best set up is to pay with real money. I have been a big defender that PGI has not made this game P2W. but I feel this is a little much...

It's because there are many posts about the same darn thing. You want to talk about it? Talk about it in one post (you know the one with 126+ pages ...)

[Grand Ayatollah Kerensky]

Oh no, not a ban from a crappy p2w title like every other other crappy p2w title.

[Orzorn]

Pay 2 Post

[INAPPROPRIATE NAME 0001]

Damion Sparhawk, on 04 March 2013 - 06:00 PM, said:

how about, rather than bitching about something that isn't even activated, you wait and see how it's implimented? just a thought.

Complacency is compliance, speak out and let your voice be heard that you rebel at the very notion and they very well might notice.

The ~1200 vote "No to third person" thread seemed to have achieved us not getting that feature, for example.

[MadcatX]

Stop!

[Enig]

I've only posted two of these, this being the second.

[Stoicblitzer]

[TseTse]

Synaps3, on 04 March 2013 - 06:02 PM, said:

How about you post in the existing threads rather than making new ones to be locked?

You pay them $300 and they have to pay $50000 to hire a new staffer to delete all the forum spam you're making. Not worth it.

Delete thread please.

Right because good ideas always get seen and never lost in the background noise of 130+ page threads.....

Why not actually moderate instead of blindly slamming any thread that mentions consumables/modules/P2W or coolant into some random thread started in December before the announcement.

[Zaptruder]

Wait and see. I mean in either case that's all you can do. Even if you decide to quit the game now over this... what are you going to do when you see no posts on MWO confirming your suspicions?

What? The world didn't end? People are still enjoying the game? I don't understand!

Well... maybe not day 1, but in a couple weeks, the majority of the OMG ITS DIFFERENT THEREFORE BAD posts should have died down to help provide the signal: i.e. IT IS ACTUALLY BAD/IT IS ACTUALLY NOT BAD threads.

[MadcatX]

INAPPROPRIATE NAME 0001, on 04 March 2013 - 06:05 PM, said:

Complacency is compliance, speak out and let your voice be heard that you rebel at the very notion and they very well might notice.

The ~1200 vote "No to third person" thread seemed to have achieved us not getting that feature, for example.

Yes, and I completely agree.... with keeping it in a single thread.

[Aethon]

Why not wait for it to be implemented? Because we waited for them to implement ECM, and they never fixed it. So, no...'wait and see' does not work.

[Kadassa]

Hey this thing locked yet?