Jump to content

What Does The Community Think Of Consumables?

Started by VEightFreak427, Mar 04 2013 12:30 PM

101 replies to this topic

Poll: Consumables (470 member(s) have cast votes)

Hot or Flop?

  1. I think consumables are a good idea. (46 votes [9.81%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.81%

  2. I think consumables are a bad idea. (169 votes [36.03%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.03%

  3. I don't care either way. (17 votes [3.62%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.62%

  4. I don't know. (15 votes [3.20%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.20%

  5. Depends on how they are implemented. (222 votes [47.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 47.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#101 aptest

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • 81 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 01:24 PM

View PostVEightFreak427, on 04 March 2013 - 12:30 PM, said:

So this seems to be a pretty controversial issue already so I just wanted to ask what you guys (and girls?) think about it. I'm going to wait until they actually release them to judge but on the surface do you think they will make or break the game? How do you think PGI should go about this to prevent a P2W game?


I think more varied modules were needed. binding active abilities into modules is a good idea that will allow to make useful modules. consumables (X per match active uses) allow to put in some more interesting ideas although cooldown based modules also good.

As for C-Bill costs, im niether for or against this idea.

As for MC per usage costs: hell no.

#102 I am

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 542 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 01:27 PM

Consumables

Posted ImagePosted Image

Its whats for dinner.
Back to Archive · Next Unread Topic →


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users