Jump to content

Pgi Appreciation Thread



28 replies to this topic

#21 venomman2

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 64 posts
  • LocationWisconsin (SE)

Posted 04 March 2013 - 06:40 PM

View PostStoicblitzer, on 04 March 2013 - 06:27 PM, said:

WW2 chop

Expected the first response to be similar to that but I did snicker a bit

View PostWolvesX, on 04 March 2013 - 06:28 PM, said:

I don't support pay-to-win!

Does that mean you cannot support group of people doing their job to the best of their abiliy?

View PostAntiCitizenJuan, on 04 March 2013 - 06:29 PM, said:

This has nothing to do with constructive feedback about the beta, reported

Supporting the devlopment team and their decisions is mist certainly constructive feedback

View PostLonestar1771, on 04 March 2013 - 06:30 PM, said:


Gargling dev ***** is not what is needed right now

Neither is open hostility. We can't even call this beating a dead horse, we are just beating on bloody dirt.

The point is, the Mods get the message, the Devs get the message. The vocal population is VERY unhappy with this announcement. Did anybody wonder if some *positive* reinforcement might work better? How much broken stuff has PGI fixed in the past few months? Because I am more than happy to be able to use ER PPCs at 800m.

#22 Stoicblitzer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,931 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 04 March 2013 - 06:41 PM

View Postvenomman2, on 04 March 2013 - 06:40 PM, said:

Expected the first response to be similar to that but I did snicker a bit


Does that mean you cannot support group of people doing their job to the best of their abiliy?


Supporting the devlopment team and their decisions is mist certainly constructive feedback

Neither is open hostility. We can't even call this beating a dead horse, we are just beating on bloody dirt.

The point is, the Mods get the message, the Devs get the message. The vocal population is VERY unhappy with this announcement. Did anybody wonder if some *positive* reinforcement might work better? How much broken stuff has PGI fixed in the past few months? Because I am more than happy to be able to use ER PPCs at 800m.

i'm glad i made you laugh. :(

#23 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 04 March 2013 - 06:42 PM

View PostSynaps3, on 04 March 2013 - 06:19 PM, said:

When you said the module would never happen, and then suddenly you make it....it doesn't matter if the module is made out of delicious ice cream...you still lied about it ...



Or maybe they just changed their mind? I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

#24 Rebas Kradd

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,969 posts

Posted 04 March 2013 - 06:43 PM

I appreciate PGI by being civil and fair with them, not necessarily by supporting every decision.

#25 Damion Sparhawk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 799 posts
  • LocationUS

Posted 04 March 2013 - 06:43 PM

View PostObsidianSpectre, on 04 March 2013 - 06:31 PM, said:

You didn't actually read it yourself, did you? The best version can only be purchased with real life money.

really? actually I read it twice, and it -EXPLICITELY STATES- and I quote "The amount of effectiveness between the two forms of purchase are identical at the top tier."

#26 ROFLwaffle49

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 98 posts

Posted 04 March 2013 - 06:45 PM

WOOOOO rage hahaha In all honesty I would rather have two flushes rather than one, seams more versatile to me.

#27 HRR Insanity

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 867 posts

Posted 04 March 2013 - 06:46 PM

View PostDamion Sparhawk, on 04 March 2013 - 06:29 PM, said:

really wish you people would grow up and quit bitching p2w, the only way any game can ever actually deserve that kind of label is if there is some game changing feature that is exclusive to real money, at what point did any of you actually read the thread about the coolant flush where it says, may be purchased strictly with MC and not C-bills? oh, that's right, it can be purchased in identical values with both c-bills and MC, well gee, maybe it's not quite so pay to win then, since you can buy these consumables with c-bills, exactly as you would if you were part of a real mechwarrior economy. How does this make it pay to win exactly? because someone can throw down some RL cash and buy it more frequently? well there really isn't anything preventing that -now- since if it was exclusively c-bills someone could still spend RL cash, buy a mech, sell it for half price, and still buy these consumables only now, instead of being forced to pay twice as much to supposedly 'pay to win' they're actually able to get a fair market value.
everyone of you going all berserk over this announcement should take a hint from the OP, maybe you should actually wait to see how these things are handled before you start throwing up your hands and crying wolf.


Cbill version = 35% cooling in 2 modules.
MC version = 35% cooling in 1 module.

MC version is directly superior and can only be purchased with MC.

Fail.

#28 ROFLwaffle49

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 98 posts

Posted 04 March 2013 - 06:48 PM

2 Slots for 2 uses, smaller uses, but still, its not the same thing.

#29 venomman2

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 64 posts
  • LocationWisconsin (SE)

Posted 04 March 2013 - 06:56 PM

Now look what you guys did. Couldn't keep the P2W out of just appreciating hard work and now my thread got merged into someone else's thread

*sigh*



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users