36 replies to this topic

[SteelWarrior]

armyof1, on 05 March 2013 - 01:28 AM, said:

Well they have lost a couple of times in the Olympics too, and those losses probably would not have been possible if you were allowed to pay a sum of cash to get an extra player on the court.

Its also regulated by such a large group of people. pretty hard to buy off half the world .

My main point is sometimes the victory does go to the unworthy person who had the biggest bank account. But that doesnt mean you throw in the towel and give up or just dont play at all.

[ragingmunkyz]

OP, I feel you may be representing the side of "the few" on this subject. I have a hard time believing that the community as a whole wants to see this game become P2W. You also site Blizzard as the reason an game can be successful despite "forum whiners," however you fail to account for games like Diablo III and SWTOR which fell apart because the devs did not listen to the communities, or at least didn't do that soon enough. This game is much more likely to go the way of several recent disasters than it is the one much success that started a decade ago.

[SteelWarrior]

Noobzorz, on 05 March 2013 - 01:30 AM, said:

What a dumb and counterproductive attitude.

Can you imagine the direction the game would go if no one ever provided any feedback? Do you even understand the point of a beta? You are talking about it like it is a fully released product, and as though these developers are super sensitive and likely to burst into tears after making this nice game for us that isn't intended to make them money.

Yeah. They're doing a good job. And part of that is that they've taken feedback that we've been giving them, and they've used it. No feedback, and they have to do all their play testing themselves.

Get over yourself, get off your high horse, and stop being such an apologist for people who neither need nor want for you to be such a smoochy smoochy kissy suck up.

scroll down ******. Constructive criticism is welcome. The cry bath is a waste of energy. Its okay. Hold my hand, ill get you through this.

ragingmunkyz, on 05 March 2013 - 01:32 AM, said:

OP, I feel you may be representing the side of "the few" on this subject. I have a hard time believing that the community as a whole wants to see this game become P2W. You also site Blizzard as the reason an game can be successful despite "forum whiners," however you fail to account for games like Diablo III and SWTOR which fell apart because the devs did not listen to the communities, or at least didn't do that soon enough. This game is much more likely to go the way of several recent disasters than it is the one much success that started a decade ago.

D3 failed because this isnt 1999. D2 was amazing because of the era. Fresh genre. People demand more game these days. Right clicking over and over doesnt do it. D3 launched 10 years ago would of been as huge of a hit as D2 was. Which is a fact because every game of that similar genre has failed (look at the 3rd installment of dungeon siege)

As is i still got 45 hours out of it. Worth the 60 bucks.

Edited by SteelWarrior, 05 March 2013 - 01:34 AM.

[armyof1]

SteelWarrior, on 05 March 2013 - 01:31 AM, said:

Its also regulated by such a large group of people. pretty hard to buy off half the world .

My main point is sometimes the victory does go to the unworthy person who had the biggest bank account. But that doesnt mean you throw in the towel and give up or just dont play at all.

Because the real world is heavily tipped in favor of those that have against those that don't have money, is it a valid argument that even games should be like that? What about chess, wouldn't it be a more real-life experience if you were allowed to switch out your pawns to a couple of queens if you have the money to pay for it? My point is why not try to make the playing field even for a game if you can actually make it so. But no, instead we need to let the difference in money seep in here too.

[Noobzorz]

SteelWarrior, on 05 March 2013 - 01:33 AM, said:

scroll down ******. Constructive criticism is welcome. The cry bath is a waste of energy. Its okay. Hold my hand, ill get you through this.

D3 failed because this isnt 1999. D2 was amazing because of the era. Fresh genre. People demand more game these days. Right clicking over and over doesnt do it. D3 launched 10 years ago would of been as huge of a hit as D2 was. Which is a fact because every game of that similar genre has failed (look at the 3rd installment of dungeon siege)

As is i still got 45 hours out of it. Worth the 60 bucks.

No it isn't. You've been bashing constructive criticism and babbling on like a blowhard about how competitive gamers buy $5,000 computers and that's pay to win and therefore nothing is pay to win and blah blah blah. You have said nothing of value since this whole fuckfest began.

You're a self righteous twit. What is really a waste of energy is doing your best to ingratiate yourself to the mods because mommy didn't love you. Shhhhh... shhhhh... there, there. It's okay. I can be a ***** too. Shhhhh, there there.

For the record, I too enjoyed Diablo III. I got my money's worth out of it. But now I'm beginning to worry that I was being a little polly prissy pants the way you are now and throwing a girly temper tantrum that everyone isn't getting together with me to heap praise on our glorious overlords.

Anyway, you're not impressing anyone. You're being a douchebag, and the mods don't give a ****. They want feedback, not someone on their jock.

And I was serious about the mommy thing. You must have been a little brat.

Edited by Noobzorz, 05 March 2013 - 01:40 AM.

[Sir Roland MXIII]

SteelWarrior, on 05 March 2013 - 01:33 AM, said:

D3 failed because this isnt 1999. D2 was amazing because of the era. Fresh genre.

This argument is hilarious. If it was true then FPS games would've stopped being succesful and/ or relevant in 2001. Keep on wearin' the clown suit, Steel, you were born for it.

[Budor]

Only bads will defend this dickmove. They see it as their chance to get any sort of advantage and maybe escape the elo ghetto.

This cc post really brings out the worst in me

Edited by Budor, 05 March 2013 - 01:44 AM.

[SteelWarrior]

Sir Roland MXIII, on 05 March 2013 - 01:42 AM, said:

This argument is hilarious. If it was true then FPS games would've stopped being succesful and/ or relevant in 2001. Keep on wearin' the clown suit, Steel, you were born for it.

no your argument is hilarious. the difference is hack and slash has evolved into games like DA Origins. Where the story matters and the combat requires thought. Name the last successful hack and slash that was released.

FPS has evolved too. From WWII shooters and arena based platforms to military sims like MW/COD/Arma.

But im sorry i cant dumb it down into apples and oranges for you.

Conner Coolant Flush Sinclair, on 05 March 2013 - 01:40 AM, said:

"its been alot of hard work"

Yes, but is it GOOD
that is the question.

so far, its been a mixture of "thats okay" and "thats ****" coated with a rather thick layer of over hyped promises.

PGI have made so many promises and simply avoided them because "too hard".

Theyve dived for the easy cash grabs and failed to maintain the long standing fanbase. this company is bleeding.

please link fact page that shows company is bleeding. ******.

[SteelWarrior]

Torchlight is ****. POE is as alpha as alpha gets. And D3 doesnt have a huge calling.


Your points are defeated. NEXT!

[PPO Kuro]

I'm just crossing my fingers for the upcoming updates. I really hope that buying consumable items like they discribed won't 'unbalance' this game. I'm kinda frightfull about that right now, but maybe it won't be that bad?

But I do have to agree with the OP, ppl on this forum are mega ultra uber negitive, but I think that's because some of the foaming at the mouth ppl are long time fans (atleast I hope so or otherwise they really really need to take chill pills) and wish the best for this game. Now what is best for MWO, that's a really good question. Opinions are like @ssh0les, everybody has one

[SteelWarrior]

all i know is ive spent 0 dollars. 300 games played later. pretty good bang for my buck.


PS: MC investment incoming.

[SteelWarrior]

Conner Coolant Flush Sinclair, on 05 March 2013 - 02:03 AM, said:

Opinion on torchlight. Nice way to make a pointless post

POE being alpha: uhh what. the thing is stable as stable gets. including the massive beta release and the serveral tournaments that have actually been successful (much unlike MWO's cheatfest)

D3: What about cealings now?


i woudlnt advise against it, any criticsm gets you banned these days, see my thread. and they wont refund you any left over mc.

lol id ban you.

[OneEyed Jack]

Conner Coolant Flush Sinclair, on 05 March 2013 - 02:03 AM, said:

i woudlnt advise against it, any criticsm gets you banned these days, see my thread. and they wont refund you any left over mc.

Yeah, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that your criticism was not constructive or worded so as to comply with the posting etiquette listed in the sticky.

[John MatriX82]

So, I'm a player nearing 2,500,000 xp, done mostly without any sort of premium (the free month after the OB start and 1 week during the 750mc sale of what 1 month ago).

I have something like 21 mechs, besides my Founder Atlas and the Ilya, the rest has all been acquired through Cbills; I play a lot and enjoy the game, even if it's repetitive, if I hate river night, ECM (or better ECM coupled with SSRMs which is the real problem). I've joined since CB, threw money at the game, mostly happily.

I've joined some negativity in these forums, I admit it, but later on I've been happy like a child that has been gifted the toy of his desired. Now after reading the command chair posts today I'm not happy. Not at all.


SteelWarrior, you want to play in community warfare against a lance of MC spending people that use 3-4 tier 3 modules against your lance of normal guys that can only reach tier 2 or a mix of tier 1 and 2?

Something like

Cbill players combo 1:
Coolant 2
Artillery 2
Airstrike 2

Cbill players combo 2
Airstrike 2
Artillery 1
Artillery 2

vs

Mc P2W players:
Coolant 3
Artillery 3
Airstrike 3

I don't. With the above community warfare is dead even before being implemented. I hope devs will realize that Tier 3 modules must cost two slot modules and not only one, and everything will be safe and the moaning will go to hell.

[LordDante]

i really hate qq but this one time
one more alpha strike doesnt seem much ....
tell that the poor ******* standing infront of an 100 points of dammge Stalker 5m

beating such an oponent in a yen lo wang ( i know this mech inside out so no one gives me crap about it ! ) is not very easy
making him overheat is a very importand and livesaving tactik that brought me lots of kills and saved my but numerous times.

the last time i read a Mechwarrior novel u needed on of those to flush ur cooling luiquid

[Johnny Gauss Rifles]

SteelWarrior, on 05 March 2013 - 12:12 AM, said:

PS: Going to MC my way to victory. Because MC teaches noobs not to fire LRMs close. And MC helps Johny Guass Rifles lead the target properly. Q.Q

Someone mentioned my name?

for reference.. MC does not help aim.... Johnny Gauss Rifles has spoken!


...also you spelled my name wrong

Edited by Johnny Gauss Rifles, 05 March 2013 - 03:55 AM.

[Jam the Bam]

Nerd rage over unreleased online items aside,

I think the OP is mainly trying to say to those who might be browsing the forums for the first time: The game is GOOD.

But this forum is like any other and there is too much whining and insulting getting in the way of the constructive feedback.