Riffleman, on 07 March 2013 - 09:33 AM, said:
If they go ahead and implement these stupid @$$ consumables into the game, where only the mega rich in c bills or those willing to shell out cash can compete, I believe your league is going to dry up, as well as the game. I know of at least one big group that will be pretty decimated from lack of players remaining the day this patch goes through.
I'd be happy if the league doesn't allow consumables or if it does - New tactics will form and the teams will be where the good and the bad is found, you can bet your last MC on that.
Just like ECM, Ravens, SRM-boaters, 20-Cats, pop-snipers, hill-humpers, capture-modules (remember those?), speed-cappers, LURM-boats, et-all, the pugalettos will spam the forum wah-wahing and the teams will get down to business, find out what works, how to negate or mitigate is, how to put together a drop-dec to pull the rug out from under an enemy that overly-relies on it, and everything else.
It's what they do.
The teams that dry up would have done so anyway, it doesn't bother me, but that said, I see no problem if the league decided to ban consumables, it would be just another rule, like any other.
But see if from the organisers PoV; We don't know how you can tell if an enemy is using a consumable, certainly no way to prove it unless you're recording the match, and happen to witness the air-strike, coolant flushing out, etc..
Personally I record *all* my league drops, but are you going to make it a rule that every match must be recorded? What if a whole team says the enemy "cheated" but nobody caught it on camera?
That's why some rules would be nice, but can't be included.
Remember there was talk in the very first tourney about limiting it to one instance of a particular variant per match (to cut down on multiple Gauss-cats).
But back then, how could you tell, unless you recorded footage of them on-screen at the same time?
Some rules are just so finicky to enforce it's not worth implementing them.
Edited by BigJim, 07 March 2013 - 10:06 AM.