the more SRMs a person fires within the original launchers reload rate, the higher the spread should be. this would single handedly balance out the weapon group that gets the most benefit from b oating
0
Srm Stacking Accuracy Debuff
Started by FrupertApricot, Mar 09 2013 05:45 PM
8 replies to this topic
#2
-
-
- Fire
- 3,949 posts
Member
- LocationCalifornia
Posted 09 March 2013 - 05:52 PM
No. Just . . . no.
I am so glad you people aren't game designers. So glad.
I am so glad you people aren't game designers. So glad.
#3
-
-
- Legendary Founder
- 1,636 posts
Member
- LocationAustin, TX
Posted 09 March 2013 - 05:53 PM
SRM hit detection is awful ATM anyhow...
#4
-
-
- Knight Errant
- 560 posts
Member
Posted 09 March 2013 - 05:54 PM
We already have this, if you put an LRM20 in an LRM15 slot it will fire 15 missiles and then a moment later the remaining 5.
#5
-
-
- 2,218 posts
Member
- LocationUnited Kingdom, High Wycombe
Posted 09 March 2013 - 05:58 PM
Ashnod, on 09 March 2013 - 05:53 PM, said:
SRM hit detection is awful ATM anyhow...
This is very true. even against stationary targets with my face inside their **** I still have missiles that don't hit.
Would love to know where those missiles went......
Mind you I've had times where i've completely missed with missiles (lag shooting ahead) and blasted mechs to scrap.
#6
-
-
- Survivor
- 867 posts
Member
Posted 09 March 2013 - 06:35 PM
FrupertApricot, on 09 March 2013 - 05:45 PM, said:
the more SRMs a person fires within the original launchers reload rate, the higher the spread should be. this would single handedly balance out the weapon group that gets the most benefit from b oating
This does nothing when the SRMs are fired from <50m away. SRMs should be changed to ripple fire. Then, not only would the damage tend to spread a bit, but SRM2s would have a role because they'd 'cluster' damage more than the larger launchers due to decreased total launch time.
#7
-
-
- 5,737 posts
Member
- LocationCircinus
Posted 09 March 2013 - 06:48 PM
HRR Insanity, on 09 March 2013 - 06:35 PM, said:
This does nothing when the SRMs are fired from <50m away. SRMs should be changed to ripple fire. Then, not only would the damage tend to spread a bit, but SRM2s would have a role because they'd 'cluster' damage more than the larger launchers due to decreased total launch time.
Exactly.
#8
-
-
- The 1 Percent
- 6,619 posts
Member
Posted 09 March 2013 - 07:02 PM
would make sense. missiles need room to breath too 
makes sense that they want to spread out if you got a bunch of em packed in there
makes sense that they want to spread out if you got a bunch of em packed in there
#9
-
-
- Bridesmaid
- 14,396 posts
Member
- LocationExodus fleet, HMS Kong Circumflex accent
Posted 09 March 2013 - 07:16 PM
What would this accomplish to begin with? First of all, NO ONE fires SRMs past maybe 100 meters, if they can avoid it. Then there's artemis.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
