I suggest to implement more options for a tie.
e.g. if both teams cap and one has 95% and the other 100% of the cap.
I mean where is the win here?
0
Tie
Started by Red squirrel, Mar 13 2013 02:55 AM
3 replies to this topic
#2
-
-
- Shredder
- 1,652 posts
Member
- LocationVienna
Posted 13 March 2013 - 05:13 AM
No.
You don't declare 100m sprints a tie if the 2nd guy is 0.1 s behind the 1st one.
Currently there are only 2 ways to get a tie: a) the last 2 opponents killing each other.
time running out.
And it should remain that way.
You don't declare 100m sprints a tie if the 2nd guy is 0.1 s behind the 1st one.
Currently there are only 2 ways to get a tie: a) the last 2 opponents killing each other.
time running out.And it should remain that way.
#3
-
-
- Legendary Founder
- 1,626 posts
Member
Posted 13 March 2013 - 07:04 AM
I never understood sprints in the first place or marathons:
Wow this guy did it in 1 hour 15 min 2 seconds while that other guy took 1 hour 15 min and 1.47 seconds.
Wow this guy did it in 1 hour 15 min 2 seconds while that other guy took 1 hour 15 min and 1.47 seconds.
#4
-
-
- Moderate Giver
- 7,600 posts
Member
Posted 13 March 2013 - 09:21 AM
Because one guy finished it faster, same as any other race or scored event.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users
