Jump to content

Interesting Observation Regarding Stalkers And Lrms


4 replies to this topic

#1 Soldryn

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 48 posts

Posted 30 July 2013 - 10:31 PM

After doing some experimenting I have found something interesting regarding stalkers, LRMs, and minimum range.

It would seem that the "range to target" information given to a pilot is slightly misleading in where the "actual" range is calculated. When a target claims to be at 181m, that's 181m from the ARM launchers, not the snout hardpoints. It leads me to wonder exactly where in a given chassis the range information is calculated from.

Unfortunately, I very highly doubt that anyone will care, since I believe the stalker is the only chassis to have missile hard points distributed over a horizontal axis, whereas most (if not all) other mechs have their hardpoints distributed vertically along the same plane.


Standard Disclaimer: Enjoy reading/trolling/flaming/agreeing/disagreeing with this post. I won't be reading any responses.

#2 Yiazmat

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Spear
  • The Spear
  • 531 posts
  • LocationCentral CA

Posted 30 July 2013 - 10:46 PM

actually, my friend, you're 100% correct here. at 180 meters on a stalker, lrms will bounce off a target. tested it just now. something to do with the range placement. maybe it goes off the cockpit?

#3 Johnny Reb

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 3,945 posts
  • LocationColumbus, Ohio. However, I hate the Suckeyes!

Posted 30 July 2013 - 10:49 PM

If under 190m I dont shoot my lrms. Gotta give the lrms some room to activate.

#4 Escef

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 8,530 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationNew England

Posted 30 July 2013 - 11:14 PM

Given that the "bow" of the Death Phallus is pretty far forward of center mass, it's no wonder. Honestly, firing LRMs at a target at close to minimum range is a bad idea, you're gamblig on the target not closing before the missiles get there. Just like I don't launch SRMs at people at 260 meters unless they're closing, too easy for movement to turn it into a wasted shot.

#5 One Medic Army

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,985 posts
  • LocationBay Area, California

Posted 31 July 2013 - 01:15 AM

View PostEscef, on 30 July 2013 - 11:14 PM, said:

Given that the "bow" of the Death Phallus is pretty far forward of center mass, it's no wonder. Honestly, firing LRMs at a target at close to minimum range is a bad idea, you're gamblig on the target not closing before the missiles get there. Just like I don't launch SRMs at people at 260 meters unless they're closing, too easy for movement to turn it into a wasted shot.

I had to like this, just due to calling the stalker the "Death Phallus".

As to the OP: interesting info, and this would theoretically mean that the Stalker is an even better PPC boat than previously thought, since range is based on the arm pods, whereas the enemy is kept away due to the bulbous front end, probably eeking out slightly higher damage inside minimum range.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users