Jump to content

Is F2P "done Right" Sustainable?


62 replies to this topic

#61 Angus McBeef

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 611 posts
  • LocationA little to your left.

Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:28 AM

I thought that 'F2P game' and 'game done right' were mutually exclusive conditions. I've yet to find one that fits both.

#62 MaddMaxx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 5,911 posts
  • LocationNova Scotia, Canada

Posted 27 March 2013 - 11:37 AM

At $15.00 dollars a month, MWO would cost a player $180.00 annually. My Founders package is more than a year old and I spent $120.00 and have just recently run low on that initial MC infusion.

So by my figgerens, I have already saved 60.00 in my first year, got to help kick start the MechWarrior game I have been waiting on for 10 looooong years and will likely save an additional $74.00 dollars with another annual MC purchase.

Sustainability, is like most things. Take care of them and treat them right and they will last longer than if you don't.

Then when CW arrives, I will click the Start Button and then off to the races I go in my Stable of Mechs.

So I am saving monies using this F2P model and when I told my wife that, she liked it to. It just doesn't get better than that. B)

Edited by MaddMaxx, 27 March 2013 - 11:38 AM.


#63 Noobzorz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 929 posts
  • LocationToronto, ON

Posted 27 March 2013 - 11:41 AM

TF2, LoL, DotA 2.

All great, fair payment schemes, all doing really well, all likely to continue doing so.

F2P is a perfectly workable model, even when done in a way that isn't designed to screw your players.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users