172 replies to this topic

[WhistlR]

This game is in need a lot more development, they are trying to bring in more revenue and players to get themselves off the proverbial hurdle called beta.

As far as I am concerned they are trying to sell a car with no wheels

[Roadbeer]

[Jaxass]

WhistlR, on 29 March 2013 - 06:37 PM, said:

This game is in need a lot more development, they are trying to bring in more revenue and players to get themselves off the proverbial hurdle called beta.

As far as I am concerned they are trying to sell a car with no wheels

Exactly, they're like little children adding bigger and bigger ideas and trying to deliver while not finishing off the basis of the game. This is going to be a train wreck (bigger than it already is).

[IceCase88]

Roadbeer, on 29 March 2013 - 08:28 AM, said:

This is serious business, I demand a poll.

I demand a nerfing, a balancing, a buffing, or some other kind of -ing!

[Devil Fox]

Wow do these articles REALLY want to conflict each other...

But seriously UI 2.0 in June or July... they've been working on that for the last few months, and they said it would've been out within April or early May. So from that I take it ALOT of the systems we're been waiting on are being saved to implement into CW patch so the entire game will become broken prior to full release (you know like how each patch before open beta had some serious game issues and balancing).

What I demand is a content roadmap on the CW features... not vague dates from press-releases where PGI are too scard to put something on the forums. It feels more like we circumvent the feedback and possible backlash by just making it impossible for the users to constructively criticise PGI's decisions. So many posts removed/deleted that openly question PGI recently...

PGI's integrety? Where did it go? Well a bin seems to be in the corner...

[The Last Blade]

Agent of Change, on 29 March 2013 - 08:20 AM, said:

I am unsure as to how to feel about this all.

Excited but worried like a skydiver who didn't pack his own shoot.

*chute

[Loc Nar]

Quote

Quote

Agent of Change, on 29 March 2013 - 09:20 AM, said:

I am unsure as to how to feel about this all.



Excited but worried like a skydiver who didn't pack his own shoot.

*chute

still, it's one of the best analogies I've ever heard, both as it pertains to MWO and in general. IRL Ironically, I'm a pilot and fly with a chute that in fact someone else indeed packed... but I don't jump out of perfectly good airplanes anyhow!

[Lagfest]

-Edit-
After further consideration, I have decided this post was stupid... and will be deleted.
See below

Edited by Lagfest, 30 March 2013 - 12:27 AM.

[shadN]

1. I LOVETHIS GAME! Thanks PGI for creating a game in the BT universe.

2. I am happy that battle for territory is coming.

3. Overall, the balancing has been improved all the time.

4. IMO, Clan Tech will be impossible to balance. And it will lead to shorter matches because of the more potent weaponry. I don´t like Clan Tech.

5. Please, PGI, fix ECM. It is OP.

[Lagfest]

Niko Snow, on 30 March 2013 - 12:11 AM, said:

*Squints* No...
You live...
You live to remember this.
*walks away*

>.>
/wipes sweat off brow,
message recieved

[Vassago Rain]

And so it was that MWO became world of robots.

[Hawkwings]

nah, not world of robots. World would imply massive, long-term and sustained, instead of Robot Arena Fights like we have now. This is no more an MMO than Team Fortress 2 is.

Not world of robots. Maybe town, or neighborhood. There we go, Neighborhood of Robots. Doesn't that sound pleasant?

[MustrumRidcully]

IceCase88, on 29 March 2013 - 06:52 PM, said:

I demand a nerfing, a balancing, a buffing, or some other kind of -ing!

Beating. It will continue until morale improves.

Quote

Not world of robots. Maybe town, or neighborhood. There we go, Neighborhood of Robots. Doesn't that sound pleasant?

There isn't a "The Sims: Giant Stompy Robots" Addon, is there?

Edited by MustrumRidcully, 30 March 2013 - 09:47 AM.