Jump to content

Community Warfare Plans According To Russ Bullock


5 replies to this topic

#1 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 29 March 2013 - 05:27 PM

I don't know if this has been posted before due to the *polite cough* awesome *polite cough* search capability, but I thought the community would like to know this:

Source

Quote


"And then you have the Merc Corps. These are the guilds, these are the clans, these are the guys who come together, band together, fight together and play together and actually want to control as much territory as they can through their actions.

The lone wolf play style is what players currently have in the game today; the NPC factions will be free-to-play; the Merc Corps, on the other hand, will be monetized. "We're looking at possibly charging a one-time setup fee," Ekman said. "This is just to make sure there's not a flood of one-player corps.

"We really want people who participate in this to be as engaged as possible. And we'll probably require them to have a premium time account, as a kind of dedication level." That premium time account can be purchased in quantities ranging from daily to monthly to bi-annually, with the 30-day pack costing $10.

When asked to define what the cutoff for "late summer" was, both Ekman and Bullock said "September 21" in unison. So it sounds like they're leaving themselves as much room as possible to hit 1.0.


So, to play community warfare, it is pay to play. Am I reading this right?

#2 Protection

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,754 posts
  • LocationVancouver

Posted 29 March 2013 - 05:28 PM

The riot already began: http://mwomercs.com/...-p2play2gether/

Come smash some windows with us.

This is the dumbest of PGI's business decisions yet, and this is a company with a history of monthly terrible business decisions.

#3 Ozric

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 1,188 posts
  • LocationSunny Southsea

Posted 29 March 2013 - 05:29 PM

um, you appear to be yes... I need more information.

#4 Tennex

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 6,619 posts

Posted 29 March 2013 - 05:29 PM

http://www.youtube.c...d&v=RTFQsdgSA9s

that happens to go against everything here.

but what do i know. like PGI i've never made a successful F2P before.

Edited by Tennex, 29 March 2013 - 05:30 PM.


#5 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 29 March 2013 - 05:30 PM

View PostProtection, on 29 March 2013 - 05:28 PM, said:

The riot already began: http://mwomercs.com/...-p2play2gether/

Come smash some windows with us.

This is the dumbest of PGI's business decisions yet, and this is a company with a history of monthly terrible business decisions.


Thank you for the link. That would also explain why their horrible search didn't find it. *sigh*

#6 Felicitatem Parco

    Professor of Memetics

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,522 posts
  • LocationIs Being Obscured By ECM

Posted 29 March 2013 - 05:30 PM

There is actually a massive thread about this issue. I'll post a link here http://mwomercs.com/...-p2play2gether/

The forum staff has asked that the linked thread be used as the community's joint discussion thread until some kind of official thread or announcement is created, so this thread will be locked and Users are asked to follow the link to the pre-existing thread to discuss it. Thanks for understanding.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users