![](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_images/master/icon_users.png)
![](https://static.mwomercs.com/img/house/lonewolf.png)
Awesome Heavy Metal Highlanders Out There?
#1
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:27 AM
#2
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:28 AM
#3
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:31 AM
#4
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:34 AM
#5
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:38 AM
#6
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:38 AM
The Atlas is technically, lost tech, Big star league technology. It was made to be the perfect Assault, especially designed by Kerensky.
In short, don't expect most Assaults to be held to the Atlas standard, which has tons and tons of Variants, compared to the Stone Rhino, and Naginata.
![:(](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png)
Even though there are bigger Assaults, the Atlas is supposed to be the Staple Assault.
Anything beyond 100 tons is too sluggish and is just Elemental Light Mech Bait
Plus shipping them anywhere is a nightmare
Edited by Timuroslav, 03 April 2013 - 09:40 AM.
#7
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:39 AM
Spinning Burr, on 03 April 2013 - 09:27 AM, said:
This: http://t1.gstatic.co...j6F2XxYpKDIiMhZ
Sadly, ETA on that is when the non-MC Highlanders arrive.
#8
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:39 AM
Vassago Rain, on 03 April 2013 - 09:28 AM, said:
Really? How so? If you put the same size engine in each mech the Highlander will always be faster. Maybe not by much, but still faster. Even with a max engine comparisson the Highlander is faster with a smaller engine - barely, but faster.
#9
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:41 AM
Alternatively, a close range brawler with jets with 3 medium lasers, SRM6x2, and some smaller ballistic in right arm allowing for a standard engine and jump jets.
I'm spoiled with my Awesomes 9M and PB cruising at over 85 kph. I hope the Highlander can get up to 75 kph with XL or 70 kph with standard engine.
Edited by Spinning Burr, 03 April 2013 - 09:45 AM.
#10
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:41 AM
#11
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:43 AM
#12
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:43 AM
Since even with a max engine it basically moves the same speed as an Atlas, the JJ are more about superior positioning than anything else, which makes me look at this mech more as a long range support than a brawler.
#13
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:44 AM
Edited by Shock Hazard, 03 April 2013 - 09:44 AM.
#14
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:44 AM
Shock Hazard, on 03 April 2013 - 09:44 AM, said:
Waste of a mech
#15
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:47 AM
Timuroslav, on 03 April 2013 - 09:38 AM, said:
The Atlas is technically, lost tech, Big star league technology. It was made to be the perfect Assault, especially designed by Kerensky.
Not really, there are several factories that make them at 3025...
#16
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:50 AM
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...02bcdaaf14be73d
Definitely as slow (or slower) than an Atlas in a straight line. Far better maneuverability though and the ability to mount almost all your firepower in your arms is tremendous. Jumping lets you distribute damage now vertically (across your legs) and it also lets you get out of enemy firing arcs while keeping them in your own. I'm enjoying it a lot - definitely a fun mech.
P.S. 27 point single arm alpha in your face.
Edited by TruePoindexter, 03 April 2013 - 09:52 AM.
#17
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:53 AM
#18
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:56 AM
GonZo626, on 03 April 2013 - 09:34 AM, said:
I am running a 300 STD with the Guass, 3 Large Lasers, 1 SRM6, 1 SRM4 and 13 DHS.
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...37e46053b27c6db
I might change it up depending. Right now 20 shots with guass is fine unless I find I need more. I might drop the SRM ammo to 1 ton and add the ton to guass ammo.
Edited by Ngamok, 03 April 2013 - 09:57 AM.
#19
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:58 AM
Spinning Burr, on 03 April 2013 - 09:53 AM, said:
59.4kph
65.3kph w/ speed tweak
If you want a fast Assault you need to look at the Awesome.
#20
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:58 AM
TruePoindexter, on 03 April 2013 - 09:50 AM, said:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...02bcdaaf14be73d
Definitely as slow (or slower) than an Atlas in a straight line. Far better maneuverability though and the ability to mount almost all your firepower in your arms is tremendous.
That has its positive and its negative. The negative is you're more likely to lose your weapons more quickly than if they're torso-mounted.
Edited by jay35, 03 April 2013 - 09:58 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users