Personally I agree with the "I hope we get more choices" But if not I'll go with the Hunchback or Jenner. They'd get more use, as an Atlas is just one big target, and the Catapult just looks silly and is really only a support 'mech. Plus the bonus XP/Cash is only on the Founder 'mech so selling it would be foolish and its entirely possible that it won't be sellable anyway.
Another deciding factor in your Founder's Mech
Started by Gut, Jun 04 2012 04:27 AM
24 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 04 June 2012 - 07:55 AM
#22
Posted 04 June 2012 - 08:16 AM
I am hoping for more detailed information about how c-bills/xp are specifically gained, how the c-bill/xp bonus will work on each mech and if there will be some sort of try-before-you-buy option for the Founder mechs. If there is, I can make a more informed choice. Though I am leaning towards the Jenner or Hunchback anyways. The Catapult looks great imho but I've never really been good in heavies or assualts in MW multiplayer.
#23
Posted 04 June 2012 - 08:23 AM
i won´t get an atlas, period. and even if there will be lots of them out there, catapult was the one i wanted when it was first announced... its one of my alltime favs, and i want it...
#24
Posted 04 June 2012 - 08:23 AM
Eh, I'm going to pick my founder mech off personal taste. I've loved the catapult for years and I like being a more support like role. I might not be doing killing blows but hopefully my assists will add up from softening the armor of heavier targets.
#25
Posted 04 June 2012 - 08:37 AM
I just don't see myself ever using assaults much, at least not the Atlas (unless/until the AS7-K is available). I don't want to have to walk my expensive AC20-toting war machine across the field while getting pounded by LRMs and PPCs from long range.
For me, I wish I could have a Cicada founder mech, or Dragon from the heavies. I'll make do with the CPLT.
For me, I wish I could have a Cicada founder mech, or Dragon from the heavies. I'll make do with the CPLT.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
















