Jade Kitsune, on 20 April 2013 - 04:45 PM, said:
He's got a point, it's poorly worded, but it doesn't change the truth.
You're slumming it. essentially. with the ELO reset, you're playing in the "Low" elo tier where there's not as many of the high tier players that utilize the FOM builds.
It's literally that simple, it's just how the system works, if you're good,even without using FoM, you end up fighting FOM.
Lots of misinformation it seems to me on ELO.
ELO was not reset .,.. it was recalculated. They took all of your win/losses since it was implemented and fixed a bug which had caused the ELO gain to be too large when fighting weaker teams (so a group of folks that played a lot had artificially high ELO). It did not have declining returns (meaning the gain would reduce as your ELO got higher) ... as a result they ended up with a skewed bimodal distribution rather than a single peaked distribution.
The second post in the following thread describes it in case you haven't read it:
http://mwomercs.com/...ted-april-19th/
Everyone is probably running into more beginner players since the center of both distributions now lies at the same ELO value ... but if your ELO was justifiably high before this adjustment ... then it is STILL high now. Relative placement probably hasn't changed very much ... the matchmaker just has an easier time putting matches together since the ELOs are more meaningful.
BUT ... trying to claim that the in-game experience of some folks is incorrect because their ELO was reset is just misleading ... nothing was lost in the recalculation ... if they had a high ELO before then they probably have one after and are more or less in the same tier.