137 replies to this topic

[Voridan Atreides]

Willie Sauerland, on 16 May 2013 - 04:49 AM, said:

Yes.
But for that meme we need a picture.

So....any stalkers for hire?

[Willie Sauerland]

Voridan Atreides, on 16 May 2013 - 05:59 AM, said:

So....any stalkers for hire?

Perhaps a friendly PGIGP person
could be bribed?

[Voridan Atreides]

Willie Sauerland, on 16 May 2013 - 08:27 AM, said:

Perhaps a friendly PGIGP person
could be bribed?

Sounds good. What is something Canadians cannot resist?

[Agent of Change]

Maple syrup

Poutine

Hockey

The word "sorry"

Socialized Healthcare

Snow

large tracts of relatively uninhabitable land

being Americas Hat

Naming half of huge waterfalls

Tolerating french seccessionists for some reason

Calling round slices of ham "Bacon

Having an easily mockable currency "the looney" heh

Breaking from their "colonial oppressors" by sending a box of choclates and asking nicely

Burning down Washington DC (this may be just a historical delicacy)

Beavers

Oh and Molson.

I think i got it all covered

[Mike Forst]

I don't even have my picture on my Facebook

[Willie Sauerland]

Mike Forst, on 16 May 2013 - 11:52 AM, said:

I don't even have my picture on my Facebook

What is this facebook of which you are talking?

[Willie Sauerland]

miSs, on 16 May 2013 - 12:06 PM, said:

That would be a severe CoC violation.

Next!

Hi miSs!

[Noesis]

[Mike Forst]

Well that sure is a thing

[blinkin]

miSs, on 16 May 2013 - 12:06 PM, said:

That would be a severe CoC violation.

Next!

it seems to just imply that you cannot be involved in conduct related to stalking. as far as i can tell the act of hiring a stalker seems to be ok. sharing personal information is bad, but i think any decent stalker could work it out on his/her (effort to avoid any sexual bias, i believe that any sex, race, religion, sexual preference, etc. can effectively be a stalker) own.






wooo! i may have just been instrumental in adding a new rule to the CoC.

[Mike Forst]

That's a bad post

[Voridan Atreides]

Mike Forst, on 16 May 2013 - 11:52 AM, said:

I don't even have my picture on my Facebook

You have Facebook?!?!? I can just stalk you on their!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahahhahahahhaha!!OPIUHJNFOIUHKN*@)&$^*)@*(@ONGOPEM ...ewpigjpoaz?

Edited by Voridan Atreides, 16 May 2013 - 04:02 PM.

[Mike Forst]

I think that would be a mistake

[Voridan Atreides]

Why would you think that?

[Mike Forst]

Voridan Atreides, on 16 May 2013 - 04:02 PM, said:

You have Facebook?!?!? I can just stalk you on their!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahahhahahahhaha!!OPIUHJNFOIUHKN*@)&$^*)@*(@ONGOPEM ...ewpigjpoaz?

miSs, on 16 May 2013 - 12:06 PM, said:

That would be a severe CoC violation.

Next!

[Voridan Atreides]

Gotcha. However I don't think Facebook follows the rules of the MWO Forum CoC. Fair game my friend.

[Willie Sauerland]

So, if stalking is against the CoC,
does that mean that Mr. Forst is breaking said CoC
by stalking our forums?

[Noesis]

I think I'm developing

Willie Sauerland, on 17 May 2013 - 01:14 AM, said:

So, if stalking is against the CoC,
does that mean that Mr. Forst is breaking said CoC
by stalking our forums?

"Forst Paranoia"; a social anxeity that the "Most Interesting Admin on the Forum" finds you interesting.

You could have a legal case Willie, but based on the notion that he doesn't read any of our posts could that be considered as an intrusion of personal posting?

[Willie Sauerland]

Noesis, on 17 May 2013 - 03:26 AM, said:

"Forst Paranoia": a social anxeity that the "Most Interesting Admin on the Forum" finds you interesting.

You could have a legal case Willie, but based on the notion that he doesn't read any of our posts could that be considered as an intrusion of personal posting?

Being a stalker does not imply voyeurism.
As such, reading is clearly not necessary.
However, intrusion of personal posting is certainly a possibility.

[Agent of Change]

no he

is right