Jump to content

Assisted Targeting Should Be In A Different Color.


3 replies to this topic

Poll: poll (15 member(s) have cast votes)

Should assisted targetting be in a different color from red

  1. Yes (12 votes [80.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 80.00%

  2. No (3 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Tennex

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 6,619 posts

Posted 29 May 2013 - 11:10 PM

To let us know if the target we are seeing is being assist targeted.

the color to distinguish between your own visual targeting and other peope assist targetitng should be different.

yellow for assisted target.
red for line of sight target..

this way it will be easier to determine whether your LRMs are using direct or indirect fire.
As well as if artemis is doing full effect or not.

Missile locks using assisted target should also use a yellow lock circle instead of red

Edited by Tennex, 07 June 2013 - 09:47 AM.


#2 Sephlock

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,819 posts

Posted 29 May 2013 - 11:57 PM

Yes, but honestly after all this time I really don't trust PGI with the power to change the colors of things (see: hard to read text colors being changed into other hard to read text colors ;)).

#3 Mechteric

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 7,308 posts
  • LocationRTP, NC

Posted 30 May 2013 - 06:08 AM

I wouldn't change colors either, but it would be neat if we could get some number indicator of how many friendlies have the currently targeted enemy targeted.

Edited by CapperDeluxe, 30 May 2013 - 06:08 AM.


#4 Theodor Kling

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 604 posts

Posted 07 June 2013 - 10:18 PM

View PostCapperDeluxe, on 30 May 2013 - 06:08 AM, said:

[...] but it would be neat if we could get some number indicator of how many friendlies have the currently targeted enemy targeted.

I would do both.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users