Jump to content

Srms


4 replies to this topic

Poll: SRM buffing (21 member(s) have cast votes)

should we increase SRM damage to 2.0 per missile?

  1. Yes (17 votes [80.95%])

    Percentage of vote: 80.95%

  2. no (2 votes [9.52%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.52%

  3. buff them, but not that much. (1 votes [4.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.76%

  4. Abstain (1 votes [4.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.76%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 PenitentTangent

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 183 posts

Posted 05 June 2013 - 06:30 AM

I think SRMs should be buffed to 2.0 damage, but I think it's important to find out what the general population believes.

Edited by PenitentTangent, 05 June 2013 - 06:31 AM.


#2 Sephlock

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,819 posts

Posted 05 June 2013 - 06:40 AM

View PostPenitentTangent, on 05 June 2013 - 06:30 AM, said:

I think SRMs should be buffed to 2.0 damage, but I think it's important to find out what the general population believes.

You poor guy... You'll learn. You'll learn.

#3 Neolisk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 547 posts
  • LocationMississauga, ON

Posted 05 June 2013 - 12:11 PM

View PostPenitentTangent, on 05 June 2013 - 06:30 AM, said:

I think SRMs should be buffed to 2.0 damage, but I think it's important to find out what the general population believes.

Agree, SRM is useless as it is right now.

View PostSephlock, on 05 June 2013 - 06:40 AM, said:

You poor guy... You'll learn. You'll learn.

What do you mean? Did not get your humour.

#4 Demosthones

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 71 posts

Posted 05 June 2013 - 12:17 PM

I think he is implying that a person is smart (good to get an opinion from), but people are dumb (do not waste your time).

I voted btw. SRMs do not work as well as they should. They put up damage with the tighter spread, but they can not kill anything when used as the primary weapon. They strip armor and that is about it.

Edited by Demosthones, 05 June 2013 - 12:40 PM.


#5 Neolisk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 547 posts
  • LocationMississauga, ON

Posted 05 June 2013 - 12:34 PM

View PostDemosthones, on 05 June 2013 - 12:17 PM, said:

I think he is implying that a person is smart (good to get an opinion from), but people are dumb (do not waste your time).

I thought Sephlock meant that PGI does not care much about opinions expressed in this forum. He however could have meant some higher matters, such as "to survive in this world, you don't need to go with the majority", or something like that.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users