I Love How There's No "bugs" Section For A Beta Game -_-
#1
Posted 08 June 2013 - 09:50 AM
#2
Posted 08 June 2013 - 10:14 AM
#3
Posted 08 June 2013 - 11:06 AM
duh
Edited by RGoulet, 08 June 2013 - 11:07 AM.
#4
Posted 08 June 2013 - 11:49 AM
#5
Posted 08 June 2013 - 11:59 AM
RGoulet, on 08 June 2013 - 11:06 AM, said:
duh
So, "known issues" part of this particular section (the one you posted in) is not good enough for some reason?
#6
Posted 08 June 2013 - 12:02 PM
IceSerpent, on 08 June 2013 - 11:59 AM, said:
So, "known issues" part of this particular section (the one you posted in) is not good enough for some reason?
I don't know another ebta I've been a part of where I have to browse through several subforums and then browse stickied threads to find a place to consolidate bugs in the game
#7
Posted 08 June 2013 - 02:23 PM
RGoulet, on 08 June 2013 - 12:02 PM, said:
I don't know another ebta I've been a part of where I have to browse through several subforums and then browse stickied threads to find a place to consolidate bugs in the game
You are not getting it - the "place to consolidate bugs" is sending tickets to support, as they (PGI that is) are the only ones who need that consolidation. "Known issues" section is where we (players) can see what bugs PGI is supposedly working on. Creating a bug tracker on the forums is not very useful, because none of us can actually fix bugs.
#8
Posted 08 June 2013 - 02:52 PM
A bug forum specifically for bugs is essential. The way this forum is set up with a bazillion sub forums and other stupid nonsense is beyond idiotic, it's counter-productive and I have no idea how the devs can collate the data they need on bugs. I can only assume they don't, which is why we still see Ultra AC/5's still jamming every second shot, machine guns still hitting like a poof, and all bought expensive overpriced mechs being essentially broken, like the AUD$40 Misery I bought that had to be gutted to be playable and still is horribly broken because it's one ballistic point can't load an AC20 without a standard engine which then means you can't have any other decent weapons.
It SHOULD be able to have an AC20, an LRM20 and an XL320 engine like in the table top and then still have two machine guns and a bunch of medium lasers to spare. BUT NOOOO. Devs will NEVER hear our complaints because they're scattered everywhere and they're too busy overpricing COLORS for real world money to notice. Yes. I'm bitter.
IceSerpent, on 08 June 2013 - 02:23 PM, said:
You are not getting it - the "place to consolidate bugs" is sending tickets to support, as they (PGI that is) are the only ones who need that consolidation. "Known issues" section is where we (players) can see what bugs PGI is supposedly working on. Creating a bug tracker on the forums is not very useful, because none of us can actually fix bugs.
You mean EMAILING support? It sure is good to see they're not making it any easier to submit errors. Not on a forum, no. Nooo. Not by support tickets. Nope. By email. EMAIL. Then they get your email address and subscribe it to *** **** sites for criticizing them and not just handing over all your money like the guys at Kerbal Space Program do, Squid, or Squad, or whatever their name was (the ones who spent all their paid beta cash on drugs then a week later confessed to being almost bankrupt and stealing community modders code to make new 'releases' to make it to steam).
Edited by Destined, 10 June 2013 - 01:18 PM.
Inappropriate content
#9
Posted 08 June 2013 - 03:03 PM
bashpr0mpt, on 08 June 2013 - 02:52 PM, said:
Let me put it to you this way: I am not really opposed to the suggestion - I don't really care if there is a forum section called "bugs" or not (why would I give a broken dime about it?). What I am trying to say is that those of us who have been here for a while have a pretty good understanding on how PGI operates and therefore know that chances of them changing their ways and starting to use this "bugs" section as an actual bug tracker just because you want them to do so are exactly nil.
Edited by Destined, 10 June 2013 - 01:18 PM.
Quote clean up
#10
Posted 08 June 2013 - 03:06 PM
#11
Posted 08 June 2013 - 03:33 PM
Edited by Deathlike, 08 June 2013 - 03:34 PM.
#12
Posted 09 June 2013 - 08:49 PM
Edited by redreaper, 09 June 2013 - 08:50 PM.
#13
Posted 09 June 2013 - 09:44 PM
How much simpler can it get? mix all the dev posts (which would end up being stickies) into this forum? we'd have a few pages of stickies before getting to active topics which would be stupid.
#14
Posted 10 June 2013 - 01:14 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users