If you can pay to remove JJ shake, that will be the very definition of P2W. Unless you are horrible at poptarting. In which case .... nothing to say.


Would You Pay To Remove Jj Shake?
Started by Bluemaxx, Jun 11 2013 05:35 AM
30 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 13 June 2013 - 12:42 AM
#22
Posted 13 June 2013 - 12:47 AM
Unnecessary to remove JJ shake and going P2W even harder than WoT dared.
Dear OP, what do you intend with such atrocities ?
Dear OP, what do you intend with such atrocities ?
#23
Posted 13 June 2013 - 12:48 AM
Voted yes and no... Actually Im all for this idea. Its great... just make it something realistic like 1 million MCs per Mech (not chassie) though.
Edited by Rushin Roulette, 13 June 2013 - 12:48 AM.
#24
Posted 13 June 2013 - 12:59 PM
NO???? PAY 2 WIN?!?
#25
Posted 13 June 2013 - 09:11 PM
No, and it's a terrible idea to make it possible.
#26
Posted 14 June 2013 - 12:10 PM
I would pay for OP shake. Maybe five bucks or so that lets me hit a button and shake the crap out of people who post ******** ideas.
Edited by canned wolf, 14 June 2013 - 12:10 PM.
#27
Posted 14 June 2013 - 01:57 PM
I would pay to have a hotkey for your mechs head to explode.
#28
Posted 15 June 2013 - 03:35 AM
No, and I wouldn`t even buy a reduction module, either.
It took all of ten minutes to get used to. Maybe because I was already letting go of the JJs before firing becasue I`m not a mechanic exploiter....
It took all of ten minutes to get used to. Maybe because I was already letting go of the JJs before firing becasue I`m not a mechanic exploiter....
#29
Posted 15 June 2013 - 03:39 AM
lol
#30
Posted 17 June 2013 - 08:44 AM
It was a necessary nerf. This JJ sniping was really ruining matches and has nothing to do with awesome Mech gameplay. It was also really frustrating for everyone else. It is a good solution. Deal with it.
#31
Posted 19 June 2013 - 08:06 PM
I'd prefer if they just got rid of it on their own, but if paying would help me play my Spiders again...hell yeah I'd pay!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users