

Concerning Ferro And Endo-Steel [Newbie]
#1
Posted 11 June 2013 - 07:28 AM
I want to discuss Ferro Fibrous Armor and Endo-Steel Structure.
I always tend to take them because all they seem to be doing is taking out some tonnage off of my mechs. However, most of the builds I see posted on this forum just run standard Armor and Structure. Why is this? Does FFA and ESS have some sort of hidden downside?
I think I recall them taking up extra slots or something like that, but I have so many slots I don't know what to do with them. I run Commandos 1B, 1D, and 2D, as well as a Cicada 2A.
Thanks in advance.
#2
Posted 11 June 2013 - 09:17 AM
As a last word of advice I would buy endo steel for your first new mech and use the freed up tonnage and gain some experience in the game before investing into something like XL engines.
Edit:
You probably want to try out your mech configuration before actually buying things with CBills/MC, check this link out
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...echlab#modified
Edited by Autobot9000, 11 June 2013 - 09:20 AM.
#3
Posted 11 June 2013 - 05:26 PM
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Endo_Steel
http://www.sarna.net...ion_Engine_-_XL
#4
Posted 11 June 2013 - 06:03 PM
For bigger mechs it's often not worth it. Big weapons take up more slots, so Endo-Steel sometimes won't fit. Most mechs usually have room for it though. Ferro-Fibrous is very rarely used, it gives less tonnage per slots compared to ES and there's rarely room for both.
As for XL engines, they're useful for lights that really benefit from the massive boost to free tonnage. However they take up slots in both side torsos, so you die when you lose a side torso. That's a vulnerability that most heavier mechs don't get enough advantage from to risk.
Edit:
The other thing to mention of course is Double Heatsinks. Unlike Endo, FF and XL Engines Double Heatsinks are almost ALWAYS a huge improvement. Each engine over a 250 rating gets a free ten invisible heatsinks inside the engine. Double Heatsinks are worth 2 standard heatsinks inside the engine and 1.4 outside. Which means you're getting the equivelant of ten free single heatsinks in the engine for no extra cost of tonnage or slots, a huge, huge advantage.
Engines below 250 need an extra external heatsink for every 25 engine points below (1 at 225, 2 at 200, etc). These operate as standard external heatsinks, which is one of the reasons the Commando is thought of as such a weak option, not only does it lose slots for having to have two external heatsinks, it doesn't even get as much cooling as a 250+ engine.
Only Streak SRM2 boating Commando-2D's and Medium Laser boating XL Engine Assaults are better off with Single Heatsinks. The Commando 2D because streaks are relatively low heat and between the XL Engine/Endo you simply can't fit in two 3 slot double heatsinks. The Assualts because they have far more tonnage than slots. Though Medium laser boating XL Engine Assaults is a moot point, as no one uses them. On anything else they're a straight upgrade and should be equipped if you want to be competitive.
Edited by Mahws, 11 June 2013 - 06:21 PM.
#5
Posted 04 January 2015 - 09:05 AM
#6
Posted 04 January 2015 - 09:53 AM
@chiken: Which is it, endo-steel structure, or ferro-fibrous armor?
#7
Posted 04 January 2015 - 09:56 AM
Dragoon20005, on 11 June 2013 - 05:26 PM, said:
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Endo_Steel
http://www.sarna.net...ion_Engine_-_XL
Do not quote Sarna as a reference for gameplay!
Sarna is great for trivia; but it is not an authoritative reference for MWO, and in most cases doesn't even provide game data. MWO has made important departures from the Classic BAttletech tabletop game, so referencing Sarna.net - or the tabletop rulebooks - isn't helpful when someone asks how to use equipment in this game.
Edited by Void Angel, 04 January 2015 - 09:59 AM.
#9
Posted 04 January 2015 - 10:05 PM
Also, no one checks every post to see if someone has randomly resurrected an old post unless there is time-sensitive context, and not often even then.
Besides, the point still stands.

#10
Posted 08 January 2015 - 07:05 AM
#11
Posted 08 January 2015 - 04:45 PM
NUJRSYDEVIL, on 08 January 2015 - 07:05 AM, said:
I have no idea how you came to this conclusion. Hell, I run my 1X 'phract with 2xPPC, AC20, 280 std engine, endo steel, and ferro armor.
#12
Posted 08 January 2015 - 05:56 PM
Majority of mechs 40 tons and under, can run all of the following: Endo, Fero, DHS and XL engines.
Exceptions being: COM-2D - not enough crit space; Variants of FS9 with XL280 that need room for Extra DHS
The only reason to go Endo + Fero on anythig 50 ton and above is so that you can cram in there a larger STD Engine, or you have crit space but need another ton of ammo or both:
HBK-4G and HBK-4H, CTF-2X , ON1-K , CN9-AL and most other CN9s , JM6-A not ideal but workable.
There are a few edge cases that are 50+ tons and can use Endo + Fero + DHS + XL:
TBT-3C , SHD-2D2
* Select ammo placement with great care, I just thrown it in there for "demo" / demonstration
Edited by Neput Z34, 08 January 2015 - 06:01 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users