- How had the patch generally affected your performance?
- really really bad. i noticed the changed ppc graphics, and a changed caustic valley. no more improvments. but a freaking lagging slideshow instead the flowing gameplay before. turning graphics down dont help. be4: start game> wait 10-15 secs> hear betty. now ? start game> see loading screen for 10-20 secs> see a black window around the same time> get as the last ingame where everones from 200- 500 metres away from me. best one was hearing betty and see the fireworks on forest in the middle of the map sametime^^(means my team was fighting the enemy and i was still listening the reactor getting online .._=.=
- disconnects, never had before
- Whether there are specific points in the game when your performance changes
- see above.+ slideshow, now normal aiming most time impossible, rubberbanding. normalizes shortly sometimes, without getting ever the same speed/gameflow as be4 patch
- What are your video settings, did you change them since last patch?
- changed? no. 1080P at60 Hzz, full graphics (tweaked user cfg like by crysis 2 to machine limits).; changed for testing 1080P high graphics, no aa> no change by that way, 11. juni patch makes a lil rubberbanding some times, but happens really raw times.
- Average FPS ingame and in the menus for previous patch and latest patch (Press F9 to see your FPS)
- tell me how to see now. feeled: between 5-36. be4: tested stable 36-60 (vsync)
- System specs (You can include them in a [spoiler]
- six core amd t1090T at 3.6 Ghz stable.
- 16 GB (4x4gb DC corsair kit w clocked timings/ 1t CR) ddr3 ram
- 1gb 5870ati at stable 900/1300 clock
- Gigabyte fx board
- system only ssd, mwo on a 7200rpm seagate barracuda
- [ /spoiler])
- Your advertised internet connection speed / Geographic location
- 50 Mbit dsl wire/ger
why have you guys set up the game specs so high? my pings, after jumping for 2 months between116-180, are now mostly back at 118ms. but the game lames/lags. so you must have changed :
A the graphic req. through new graphics, or through bad typed new game code (shader instrc. or so, dont know that things deeply. cause some say smoke makes big fps drop as heavy battle does also)
bad but should be easy 2 fix.
B have increased the traffic between host and client, but the 118 ping speak against, where others say it is so.
you have the tools to monitor it (ingamewatch realtime and so on from host side/dev)
C you really have turned out to test all matters/ways of game, means how far you can go till players jump out of mwo. and how high you can set the reqs for gaming (realcash, good gaming rig for best results, needed buy of ingame "items" to win, etc) and still players join mwo, so that you maximize your income and that of intel and so on. and sink the player amount. maybe kick of the laming and all time crying founders/ "hardcore´lers")?
cause right now its still a beta. you got the founders money.
dont be mad at me, i was a loyal mw warrior to this game (not pgi) after seeing this stunning "ingame gameplay graphics demo" now 5 years ago. and i hoped. and i pray. i read old books to get the flavour back. i tried smurfys for hours and days to make canon config. buy in game with 1st mech (illya), be a founder wasnt possible. played and put many spare reallife hours into this. was loyal as long as i could. but after the last 4 patches it is getting really annoying to stay a loyal bondsman to this game. many not so good things experienced to my own being ingame.
Not ppc war or such player behaviour things. Bad dev decions. srm. lpl. orion. ui. cw. hitboxes. broken hsr... (remind that fanta4 song mfg..^^)
why you do this? you loved battletech? really? wanna see a good 3-man developing show in a beloved gametype (4X genre)? google and play stardrive. you got millions. he not. and he´s farther than you by game stat.
hate me or not, i was giving you my heart and was willing to give my bucks for a released game. and you kill with much effort all my hope.
i tender 2 option C
Edited by Frederick Steiner A F, 20 June 2013 - 12:40 PM.