Jump to content

Mechwarrior Online: A Thinking Person's Shooter


19 replies to this topic

#1 mouzerius

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts
  • Locationnetherlands; terra

Posted 03 June 2013 - 01:08 PM

can you believe this nonsens they say?
i came in and got this splaterd over my screen " Mechwarrior online: a thinking persons shooter"
well its a shooter game alright but thinking....... um don`t THINK so.
every game is a death match where people slug it out in either close combat or snipping with the latest OP weapon systems.
there is no thinking in this game but wasting money on it so you can get the best mech with the latest OP weapons and moduls on it.
i just wish IGN whould stop lyong and just say its a nice shooter with big stompy robots....... :)

#2 SouthernRex

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 374 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 02:55 PM

A lot of the thinking goes on in the garage. More thinking goes on the battle field if you know how to play. ie. have team.

#3 ThinkTank

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 396 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 03 June 2013 - 03:27 PM

Just because you don't think doesn't mean the rest of us don't either.

#4 Pht

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,299 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 03:46 PM

All of the thinking that goes on is really twoards one end: blast the other guy with as much damage in his weakest spot first without getting shot yourself.

The same as in MW4/3/2/1... fine, I suppose, but not what the Mechwarrior genre could be.

Shame, really, because if it matched what it's like to pilot a 'Mech in the fictional setting, you'd have to actually know your 'mech well enough to know how well it could handle whatever situation orccuring on the battlefield.

Edited by Pht, 03 June 2013 - 03:47 PM.


#5 Stormwolf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 3,951 posts
  • LocationCW Dire Wolf

Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:57 AM

Shooter sounds about correct, I was actually hoping for a mech sim.

#6 Mister Blastman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 8,444 posts
  • LocationIn my Mech (Atlanta, GA)

Posted 04 June 2013 - 08:09 AM

Right now the thinking process works like this:

"Hmm... I think I'll try some SRMs, Medium Lasers, Machine Guns and perhaps an LB10x... yeah, that should rock the house up close!"

*a few minutes later*

Bob the gamer moves in quickly and quietly on his target, a fully decked out HGN-732, bristling with 3 PPCs/ERPPCs and a Gauss Rifle. Piece of cake, right? Just move in close and finish him off! Those ranged weapons will be useless up close.

He anticipates his opponents moves. He breathes calmly. He watches his prey for the right moment and then he pounces when the're all alone! He rushes in with a fury, his LB10x firing with a roar, his SRMs filling the skies with carbon-soaked fear andd his Machine Guns plinked away at the armor quickening the pulse of the enemy pilot inside. He grins as the armor flecks away and grips his control-stick with newly found confidence.

"Hahahaha this guy is going DOWWNNNNN!!!!!!!!!" He squealed in delight.

The Highlander struggled to turn around and then with one deft motion, the jump-jets on his back erupted in a plume of bright, vivid blue plasma and hurtled his monstrosity of metal into the air. It pirouetted with the grace of a ballerina carefully and gacefully on its toes and spun around to face Bob. The pilot inside the cockpit grinned and winked back at him. He raised his gauss-rifle toting arm and took aim.

... and FIRED!

Bob watched as three super-heated lightning bolts leaped from the Highlander followed by the sharp ball of metal behind them. They raced towards his side torso... and then... Well, all he remembers is the "EJECT, EJECT!!!" Klaxons going off his cockpit as his engine was pierced in one shot. He raced towards the heavens; up, up to the swirling clouds above he flew. Bob looked down between his legs to his once proud mech below, now exploding in a pile of ash and destruction with that ghastly Highlander standing on its corpse.

This wasn't the first time this had happened to Bob. This was the twentieth time in a row he had been one-shotted. Bob couldn't take it anymore.

It was off to the Mechlab... one last time. "THINK!" Bob scolded himself, "THINK, you *****! What do we do?!"

A lightbulb went off in his head. He quickly pulled out his credit card and purchased some MC. "I'll show you punks! You're all going to die now!"

His fingers scampered across the keyboard. His other hand's finger clicked with passion and fury. The purchase was done.

Bob stared at his new HGN-732. There was only one thing left to do. He quietly shoehorned onto it all the PPCs he could muster along with a brand new, state of the art gauss rifle and a pristine XL engine.

He pressed the launch button with authority, smiling. "Now it is MY turn!"

Bob won the next drop with 4 kills, 3 assists and 800 damage. He'd never done so well before. He one-shotted two mechs and caused the rest of his foes to tremble in angst. Bob relished in his new found skill. His great prowess. His... superior thinking!

#7 Aslena

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 138 posts

Posted 04 June 2013 - 09:31 AM

I usually play tactical strategy games not 1st person shooters... however This is MECHWARRIOR!

#8 Hammerfinn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 745 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 09:53 PM

The difference is that only a few playstyles rely on fast-twitch reflexes. Most times I'm in a match, I have to keep track of the situation, where my team is, where the other team is, and what my own capabilities are. That's way more depth and "thinking" than most shooters call for. So, yeah, I'd agree with "thinking man's shooter."

#9 Pht

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,299 posts

Posted 07 June 2013 - 02:42 PM

View PostNiko Snow, on 06 June 2013 - 09:30 PM, said:

Cogito ergo Mech bellum


Astutus omnia latine sonat...

semper in excretia sumus solim profundum variat

#10 Hammerfinn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 745 posts

Posted 08 June 2013 - 12:25 AM

View PostPht, on 07 June 2013 - 02:42 PM, said:


Astutus omnia latine sonat...

semper in excretia sumus solim profundum variat


Always at the end we are alone at the deep it changes....?

Latin PhD here, and I can't quite tell what you're trying to say....

#11 Pht

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,299 posts

Posted 09 June 2013 - 10:19 AM

View PostHammerfinn, on 08 June 2013 - 12:25 AM, said:


Always at the end we are alone at the deep it changes....?


"We're always in the manure; only the depth varies" - Lord de Ramsey, House of Lords, 21 January 1998[48]

The first one is google translate's horrible hash of "say it in latin and it sounds smart" or something along those lines.

#12 Mike Forst

    Postmaster General

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 577 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 10 June 2013 - 07:50 AM

I didn't read the OP

#13 Hammerfinn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 745 posts

Posted 10 June 2013 - 12:25 PM

View PostPht, on 09 June 2013 - 10:19 AM, said:


"We're always in the manure; only the depth varies" - Lord de Ramsey, House of Lords, 21 January 1998[48]

The first one is google translate's horrible hash of "say it in latin and it sounds smart" or something along those lines.



Ah-ha... I see it now. British schoolboy Latin is confusing. :(

#14 Pht

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,299 posts

Posted 12 June 2013 - 03:34 PM

View PostHammerfinn, on 10 June 2013 - 12:25 PM, said:



Ah-ha... I see it now. British schoolboy Latin is confusing. :)


One could have hoped it would be better than google translate latin!

#15 Hammerfinn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 745 posts

Posted 12 June 2013 - 10:20 PM

View PostPht, on 12 June 2013 - 03:34 PM, said:


One could have hoped it would be better than google translate latin!


lol... They use odd, non-classical vocabulary in many of their staple textbooks, that's all.

#16 Mike Forst

    Postmaster General

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 577 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 13 June 2013 - 08:47 AM

I don't have anything to add to this thread

#17 ThinkTank

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 396 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 17 June 2013 - 08:50 PM

I thought there were going to be Latinas in this thread.

#18 Hammerfinn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 745 posts

Posted 17 June 2013 - 09:14 PM

Nope, just Latin.

#19 ThinkTank

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 396 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 18 June 2013 - 11:32 PM

Stupid Latin. It's all XVCII and junk.

#20 Hammerfinn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 745 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 11:06 PM

That's only the numerals, and yeah, they suck. That's why English uses the handy-dandy Phoenician-derived Arabic numerals!

The rest of Latin makes way more sense than English philologically speaking.



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users