DEVS!
I simply cant take it anymore. Im out tell I see a major matchmaker update.
I could go into the nuts and bolts, but honestly at this point its no longer worth my time.
[/end]
0
Time For Matchmaker Tweeks!
Started by Funkadelic Mayhem, Jun 18 2013 04:59 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 18 June 2013 - 04:59 PM
#2
Posted 18 June 2013 - 05:30 PM
Funkadelic Mayhem, on 18 June 2013 - 04:59 PM, said:
DEVS!
I simply cant take it anymore. Im out tell I see a major matchmaker update.
I could go into the nuts and bolts, but honestly at this point its no longer worth my time.
[/end]
I simply cant take it anymore. Im out tell I see a major matchmaker update.
I could go into the nuts and bolts, but honestly at this point its no longer worth my time.
[/end]
I am about with you on this one. I have another post asking if the MM is broken because I started playing again two days ago and I am finding my teams losing 80% or more of the match ups and usually it is a one sided loss. Something is wrong especially since the MM is suppose to work on a skill system where you always matched against equal skilled players. Obviously if that is the case, you should rarely see completely one sided losses and should see a very close to 50% win/loss rate over the course of 40-50 battles.
That being said, losing 35 out of 40 battles makes the game very unfun and overally frustrating.
Edited by Viktor Drake, 18 June 2013 - 05:31 PM.
#3
Posted 20 June 2013 - 05:06 PM
The thing the devs cant seam to grasp is. Winning and fun are not the same thing.
#4
Posted 20 June 2013 - 05:10 PM
I submitted a ticket to support about this, the response was the match maker and the out to lunch weight balancing issues are low priority.
#5
Posted 20 June 2013 - 05:46 PM
krash27, on 20 June 2013 - 05:10 PM, said:
I submitted a ticket to support about this, the response was the match maker and the out to lunch weight balancing issues are low priority.
Kinda like the American GOP bring up every issue that has already been settled instead of working out THE REAL issues.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users