60 replies to this topic

[Steve Varayis]

Capt Cole 117, on 25 June 2013 - 08:55 PM, said:

And the way it should stay.

you got it my man!

[Applecrow]

True enough, but if you can actually fight while using the 3pv mode as well as 1pv, then it has become MechAssault Online.

[Stalephreak]

Steve Varayis, on 25 June 2013 - 10:11 PM, said:

you got it my man!

Irony is that to reach true hotas stage, PGI must first reach console stage. Only then can PGI transcend the pathetic console to HOTAS phase. My Saitek can run more than 3 weapons groups. You?

[Steve Varayis]

HOTAS?

[Steve Varayis]

edit: damn internet

Edited by Steve Varayis, 26 June 2013 - 12:48 AM.

[SgtKinCaiD]

I was thinking the same thing as the OP :

• We got a matchmaker instead of dedicated servers.
  
• PGI is pushing the 3PV although nobody wants it.
  
• Mechwarrior licence is actually owned by Microsoft so they let PGI develop MWO in exchange that PGI publish the game on Xbox (360 or One).

[B0oN]

It won´t... neither Cackbox 0 nor Gaystation4 are able to stomach it .

Period.
Why ?

[Steve Varayis]

Rad Hanzo, on 26 June 2013 - 02:02 AM, said:

It won´t... neither Cackbox 0 nor Gaystation4 are able to stomach it .

Period.
Why ?

That is why PC is master race

[Chavette]

Applecrow, on 23 June 2013 - 08:17 PM, said:

Who are all these people demanding 3pv? Every poll I've seen suggests the community is rejecting it wholesale.

Isn't it contradictory to implement things that they hope will bring in new players if those things are killing the game for the people who have paid already?

They are taking this game from the "hardcore" players to give it to the console gamers who might play it for a month then drop it.



BIG MISTAKE

STOP making sense, we dont like your kind here!!

[Chavette]

Rad Hanzo, on 26 June 2013 - 02:02 AM, said:

It won´t... neither Cackbox 0 nor Gaystation4 are able to stomach it .

Period.
Why ?

Except for a ton of functions like drawcalls that take 100 longer to complete in the pc software... and the many many arbitrary limitations of DX11.1 thats made to fit the lowest common denominator ... oh ignorance.

[Applecrow]

While I won't argue at all about the PC's obvious superiority, what parts of that does the MWO engine take advantage of that would prohibit it being launched on a next gen console?

Its not the point that a console can't run the same games with the same power, its that Xbone (and PS4---but I'm betting its a M$ exclusive) could run MWO in its current state. Hence burns like Abbot's bringing up DX 11.

I'm not saying I want it on Xlol 180. I'm saying its inebit..inevit able....ineviltable...

It's gonna happen.

Edited by Applecrow, 26 June 2013 - 10:04 AM.

[Soy]

*vomits multiple times reading this thread*

[B0oN]

Chavette, on 26 June 2013 - 09:38 AM, said:

Spoiler

Except for a ton of functions like drawcalls that take 100 longer to complete in the pc software... and the many many arbitrary limitations of DX11.1 thats made to fit the lowest common denominator ... oh ignorance.

Wait, Brother...it gets worse ^^

DEV´s claiming the "closed-system architecture" of Consoles are so much better to max out than ever-changing PC-Configs are partially right.

Did he say partially right ?
He did.

They only reach that level of being able to squeeze out every last drop of power inherent to the closed systems only after fiddling and programming with them after a substantial amount of time, thus giving PC hardware/software enough time to catch up and overtake any Console game, even with all the permanently changing PC setups that there are.

Oh and another thing : aren´t Consoles getting more and more similar to PC´s on the hardware side alone, are they ?

Arbitrary inherent design limitations aside (above mentioned DX11.1, which is barely used anywhere because why? Yeah, Consoles), PC´s will be still better than their Console opponents due to their openness.

Now spam me with technicalities to only further prove the things I have seen happening so far in using both sides of the coin of gaming for the amount of a whopping 28 years.

Oh and another thing is there to be asked from my side :

Isn´t the PC dead since the last 15 years ?

Edited by Rad Hanzo, 26 June 2013 - 09:04 PM.

[Steve Varayis]

Like I said.

Xbox One will have a MechAssault 3.

PS4 will have babbymech games for mech babbys

PC Master Race will have MECHWARRIOR

[Applecrow]

Steve Varayis, on 26 June 2013 - 11:41 PM, said:

PC Master Race will have MECHWARRIOR

OOooo! So someone is making a real mech game? Who? Please don't be EA, ermagherd...

[Adridos]

Rad Hanzo, on 26 June 2013 - 09:03 PM, said:

Isn´t the PC dead since the last 15 years ?

You know how it is...

[Felicitatem Parco]

Adridos, on 27 June 2013 - 07:07 AM, said:

You know how it is...

Oh... it just got is-er...

[knight-of-ni]

Zerberus, on 23 June 2013 - 01:31 AM, said:

Microsoft invented Mechwarrior to exactly the same extent that they invented MS-DOS

We will never need more than 640 Kilobytes of RAM. Never!

scJazz, on 23 June 2013 - 02:28 AM, said:

Far too many of the above responses indicate a complete lack of Trollsense.

How'd I do? Should I try harder?

[Applecrow]

Must have struck a nerve, they buried my thread even deeper!

[Soy]

SgtKinCaiD, on 26 June 2013 - 01:38 AM, said:

• PGI is pushing the 3PV although nobody wants it.

I want it.