31 replies to this topic

[POOTYTANGASAUR]

ZeProme, on 26 June 2013 - 11:36 AM, said:

Yes, it does sound like I'm bragging, but I want to show that matches with 600+ damage doesn't happen often. I know it's better if I recorded and showed a 1 vs 4 carry or something like that.

You can chime in and post some of your hard carries/ top and high damage games.



Wow, that is impressive!

Can you show me your CTF-1X build? I want to know what you run with it.


I'm confused :<

If I'm a primary medium pilot I am a newb? Well, it's true that it's the only class I began with when I started this game (HBK-4SP, CN9-A, HBK-4P) >_>

Cataphract-1X "Fetus Stomper" - http://mwo.smurfy-ne...250b1afb36628b2
You aren't necessarily a noob you may just play an average amount (like me) and you aren't a noob just for owning meds. I started with the Catapult K2 and then bought all hunches except the 4sp(not a real hunch, disgrace to the name) and i still play them but i have outgrown them a bit. I have changed playstyles a few times. I started as a sniper, then went to a light hunter, then a bare knuckle brawler, and now i am more of a mid range brawler with my Cataphract-1X and Centurions.

[ZeProme]

POOTYTANGASAUR, on 26 June 2013 - 01:35 PM, said:

Cataphract-1X "Fetus Stomper" - http://mwo.smurfy-ne...250b1afb36628b2
You aren't necessarily a noob you may just play an average amount (like me) and you aren't a noob just for owning meds. I started with the Catapult K2 and then bought all hunches except the 4sp(not a real hunch, disgrace to the name) and i still play them but i have outgrown them a bit. I have changed playstyles a few times. I started as a sniper, then went to a light hunter, then a bare knuckle brawler, and now i am more of a mid range brawler with my Cataphract-1X and Centurions.

I like this build!

My previous experience with cataphracts weren't very enjoyable. Large, low arms, and lots of weapon hard points made it difficult for me to adapt into a cataphract.

After selling it and elite-ing my mediums I want to reconsider getting a cataphract again.

[Gremlich Johns]

I once got 800 pts of damage in a Founder's HBK-4G. I thought that was pretty good. My team lost the match, sadly.

[Madara Uchiha]

ZeProme, on 26 June 2013 - 01:57 PM, said:

I like this build!

My previous experience with cataphracts weren't very enjoyable. Large, low arms, and lots of weapon hard points made it difficult for me to adapt into a cataphract.

After selling it and elite-ing my mediums I want to reconsider getting a cataphract again.

To me the practs felt like money pits...i remeber trying all expect the 3D and illya, and thinkng they were all terrible..then during the last sale i bought a illya and i must say im acually enojoying it..enough to reconsider my stance on them and maybeeee buy 2 varients and max out the perks.

[PanzerMagier]

Yea I tend to remove high damage screenies from my achievement gallery when the enemy team has several players with 0 score. (people accuse you of cannibalizing afkers for score.)

Though I recently pulled a 900dmg in a wang! ^.^
I never thought I'd see the day where I'd land all 42 ac20 shells. Must have some meaning or something, lol.

Spoiler

[PanzerMagier]

Madara Uchiha, on 27 June 2013 - 04:28 PM, said:

To me the practs felt like money pits...i remeber trying all expect the 3D and illya, and thinkng they were all terrible..then during the last sale i bought a illya and i must say im acually enojoying it..enough to reconsider my stance on them and maybeeee buy 2 varients and max out the perks.

Ilya's are great. I love the triple ultra5 variant. I refer to the picture below...

Gremlich Johns, on 27 June 2013 - 02:56 PM, said:

I once got 800 pts of damage in a Founder's HBK-4G. I thought that was pretty good. My team lost the match, sadly.

I know that feel bro, when you do absolutely amazing and then your team is made up of drooling bumbling buffoons

Spoiler

Edited by PanzerMagier, 27 June 2013 - 11:58 PM.

[Ken Fury]

You need to be amazing to do it in a Dragon:

[Gremlich Johns]

Edited by Gremlich Johns, 28 June 2013 - 02:36 PM.

[Alaskan Nobody]

I kind of like this thread >.>
It is interesting to see other peoples scores though. Haven't played in a LONG time (a couple months anyways) but looking over my old scores (tried to take consistent screenshots with fraps to track my progress) the total damage on both teams was MUCH lower.
I know my Elo was fairly low (judging from the average aim of the people I fought against anyways) but do the damage values really average so high? I would have thought better players would cause less damage (better aim anyways?)
Not trying to say you guys are crap players or anything... but that does confuse me some.
Admittedly on higher levels of gameplay the other people do learn to spread the damage more, which may explain that...?

[Pando]

Tank Boy Ken, on 28 June 2013 - 12:03 AM, said:

You need to be amazing to do it in a Dragon:

PRO

[Skadi]

Some of us like to refer to this as, Winning the "Elo Jackpot".

[PanzerMagier]

Skadi, on 29 June 2013 - 01:59 AM, said:

Some of us like to refer to this as, Winning the "Elo Jackpot".

Pretty much.