9 replies to this topic

[RiceyFighter]

12 of them are about buffing srms. 41% of the front page is the community unanimously want the same thing.

PGI maybe you should for ONCE listen to the community because they are the ones paying your bills.

Maybe some of them are waiting for you to get things right before "Buying" that phoenix package.

Fix SRMS and PPCs maybe?

[FupDup]

Clearly PGI looks for posting trends, because after all that's why they nerfed the Large Pulse Laser!

[Bagheera]

I support this message. SRMs are flat out irrelevant in any serious match.

Remove the damn splash, use Tennex's spread pattern, and set the damage to a respectable number.

Yesterday.

[Lynx7725]

You didn't know? Someone was going around resurrecting the SRM threads. You fell for it, man.

[Trauglodyte]

Or, you know, PGI could allow for the HSR for missiles data to come through to get a really good picture as to what is going on instead of listening to the constant whines based on bias.

[Sephlock]

Yeah, the rest of us have given up. Whining only works for nerfs, apparently.

[Bagheera]

Trauglodyte, on 27 June 2013 - 08:12 AM, said:

Or, you know, PGI could allow for the HSR for missiles data to come through to get a really good picture as to what is going on instead of listening to the constant whines based on bias.

Yes, because obviously the massive number of people who've been with this game since Closed Beta - many of which pre-date me and I've been here for a full year, at least - have no clue what they are talking about vis-a-vis game balance.

[Purlana]

Trauglodyte, on 27 June 2013 - 08:12 AM, said:

Or, you know, PGI could allow for the HSR for missiles data to come through to get a really good picture as to what is going on instead of listening to the constant whines based on bias.

Or maybe they could do some internal testing before they nerfed SRM DMG? Nope instead they nerfed SRMs because people whined about splat cats.

Edited by Purlana, 27 June 2013 - 08:19 AM.

[blinkin]

Purlana, on 27 June 2013 - 08:19 AM, said:

Or maybe they could do some internal testing before they nerfed SRM DMG? Nope instead they nerfed SRMs because people whined about splat cats.

no they nerfed SRM because they tried something new when they added missile splash. and when they added missile splash it broke the game completely. the only thing holding back SRM were LRM because they could turn you into a burning wreck long before you got within 270m.

Bagheera, on 27 June 2013 - 08:18 AM, said:

Yes, because obviously the massive number of people who've been with this game since Closed Beta - many of which pre-date me and I've been here for a full year, at least - have no clue what they are talking about vis-a-vis game balance.

i have looked at these forums and i am thoroughly convinced that the vast majority don't know a damned thing about game balance and most of the rest just want easy wins.

i use SRM catapults and i think SRM are just about where they need to be. 72 SRM WILL kill a healthy atlas from the rear. 3/4 of a ton of ammo to kill an atlas outright seems about right to me and definitely not weak.

[Silentium]

At least they buffed MGs.

Edited by Silentium, 02 July 2013 - 04:26 AM.