Jump to content

Make The Flamer A Debuff Weapon: Cripple Heatsinks


5 replies to this topic

Poll: Should flamers briefly cripple heatsinks? (8 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you agree with the OP?

  1. Yes (6 votes [75.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 75.00%

  2. No (1 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  3. Other (Explain) (1 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Victor Morson

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 6,370 posts
  • LocationAnder's Moon

Posted 27 June 2013 - 06:43 AM

I was thinking of ways to make the flamer more useful without making it cheesy, and while the heat transfer right now is too weak to make a case for these weapons, an idea did occur to me.

After a second or so of direct contact with the flames, a flame effect could be left on the victim 'mech for 7-8 seconds. During this time, heatsinks in the impacted areas (including engine ones) will lose three quarters efficiency.

Thus blasting someone with a flamer for a quick pass has lasting effects, and doesn't require the attacker to constantly stay nose-on-target at under 90m. It would also make the flamer useful without making it deal heat directly.

#2 AnnoyingCat

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 902 posts
  • Locationcat planet for cats

Posted 27 June 2013 - 09:43 AM

3/4? that's quiet the number there

#3 MaddMaxx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 5,911 posts
  • LocationNova Scotia, Canada

Posted 27 June 2013 - 11:19 AM

So from 3% from running, to almost 80% after a quick and dirty drive by of a Flamer, for 7-8 seconds?

How much would 2 flamers do? Drive by - KAABOOOM! :(

The numbers could be tweaked though I suppose. lol

#4 jeffsw6

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,258 posts
  • LocationLouisville, KY (suburbs)

Posted 27 June 2013 - 11:23 AM

This is an idea worthy of discussion, but I am finding it hard to really care about Flamers right now given the sorry state of SRMs, the still-broken LRM flight paths and damage largely going to CT, PPCs still not receiving any adjustments, and so on.

#5 Victor Morson

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 6,370 posts
  • LocationAnder's Moon

Posted 27 June 2013 - 01:35 PM

View PostMaddMaxx, on 27 June 2013 - 11:19 AM, said:

So from 3% from running, to almost 80% after a quick and dirty drive by of a Flamer, for 7-8 seconds?

How much would 2 flamers do? Drive by - KAABOOOM! :(

The numbers could be tweaked though I suppose. lol


It's definitely a concept you'd want to tune once you put it in place; I'd figure the easiest way to do it would be to make the duration directly linked to the number of flamers hitting the target, rather than increasing their effectiveness in other ways. Thee quarters isn't set in stone either, but the idea is to cripple heat dissipation (rather than increase heat as a primary function.)

If they had a lingering effect, I think it'd be key. Really they could pretty much take most of these mechanics from TAG, and treat it in a similar fashion.

#6 Corvus Antaka

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 8,310 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationInner Sphere

Posted 27 June 2013 - 02:48 PM

good idea, but id say 1-3 seoncds. might make flamers more useful if each flamer debuffed 1-2 heatsinks.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users