I know there has been some a lot of discussion on LPLs, but since I tested them today quite exhaustively I'd like to share my experiences:
I rebuild my standard PPC-Stalker (Standard300 2xPPC, 2xEPPC, 19DHS) into a LPL-Stalker (Standard300 4xLPL 21DHS), which is quick to do. (I wanted to try something different than using PPCs. You all know that PPC are VERY popular atm.

So, LPLs are fun, I love the deep "wub-wub-wub"-sound and damage is decent.
BUT I would never use them in a competitive build. I would always prefer the PPC build.
Why?
- Overheating felt more or less the same, probably even more since you tend to fire more when you get closer.
- Damage is slightly more, but PPCs put the damage where it belongs since they don't have a burst length, so in the end PPC-damage is more effective and it's easier to target certain locations.
- Range is the the BIG advantage of PPCs/EPPCs. You don't have to get close to do good damage and if you get close the EPPCs do the trick. With LPLs you have to get close, take more damage and have less overall time to fire them.
- PPCs disable ECM
They are supposed to be a low/medium range high damage weapon, so how could this be achieved?
Options:
- Increase damage (Yeah, the obvious one;) ). I think 12 would be okay, since damage is spread out. (But I'd rather have less heat.)
- Less heat generation (the other obvious one) Maybe 7.50 ?
- Longer range (wouldn't do that, that's what LLs and PPCs are for)
- Reduce weight/slots (impossible due to lore/mech builds)
- Reduce burst length to reduce damage spread (hmm, don't know about that one)
- Some other distinctive feature e.g. increased critical probability, since it fires in bursts. Other ideas, please?

Your thoughts, esteemed community?
