

Tag And Targeting Powered Down Mechs
#1
Posted 19 July 2013 - 05:35 AM
If you are having enemy mech in LOS targeted with TAG and this mech powers down (intentional or due to overheat), you will loose the lock, even if you have him painted with TAG before and during shutdown.
Without TAG, loosing the lock is intentional. But with target painter, wouldn't it be more appropriate to not loose the lock (or even obtain it)? About the same way you can get a lock on on a mech under ECM (>200 m) and with BAP (<120 m)?
This is only an observation, not a complaint, I was just wondering if there are any balance reasons behind this?
#2
Posted 19 July 2013 - 06:01 AM
#3
Posted 19 July 2013 - 06:58 AM
I like this idea. Heck, I would like this idea even if you required BAP to enable TAG to paint shut down mechs. (but beyond 400m).
#5
Posted 19 July 2013 - 09:14 AM
The difference is, BAP has a passive ability to target powered down mechs (<120 m). But that is of no use to missile boats, since you aren't able to damage a mech <180 m with LRMs.
I am not saying TAG should also have an ability to target powered down mech, I am asking if somebody knows if there are any rules for TAG and targeting, since I couldn't find any, and that particular detail has bothered me for a long time.
Edited by PanzerFurrry, 19 July 2013 - 09:15 AM.
#6
Posted 19 July 2013 - 11:03 AM
#7
Posted 19 July 2013 - 12:02 PM
I could be wrong, but it should still operate.
#8
Posted 19 July 2013 - 01:13 PM
#9
Posted 19 July 2013 - 01:15 PM
#10
Posted 19 July 2013 - 01:30 PM
Deathlike, on 19 July 2013 - 12:02 PM, said:
I could be wrong, but it should still operate.
It does work against powered down mechs. I tried powering down to break lock from a mech but because they had tag, I was still peppered with lrms.
#11
Posted 19 July 2013 - 01:35 PM
We are talking about a different issue of being able to lock target on a powered down mech in the first place.
#12
Posted 19 July 2013 - 01:49 PM
Ningyo, on 19 July 2013 - 01:35 PM, said:
We are talking about a different issue of being able to lock target on a powered down mech in the first place.
Ok. Got it. Thanks.
#13
Posted 19 July 2013 - 02:06 PM
#14
Posted 19 July 2013 - 03:33 PM
#15
Posted 19 July 2013 - 03:37 PM
#16
Posted 19 July 2013 - 03:44 PM
Xmith, on 19 July 2013 - 01:30 PM, said:
It does work against powered down mechs. I tried powering down to break lock from a mech but because they had tag, I was still peppered with lrms.
You got peppered because the missils were still incoming to your last location where you powered down. Nothing to do with the rest of that.
#17
Posted 19 July 2013 - 03:45 PM
http://www.sarna.net...Semi-Guided_LRM
Since MW:LL takes place during that later time, they opted to make all LRMs the "semi-guided" munition type to use with TAG. Video example below:
Technically NARC should be doing the same thing with the current timeline munitions we have now for SRMs and LRMs. SRM and LRM missiles could be upgraded at "double cost" to be "narc-seeking" capable.
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Narc
"Also SRMs and LRMs equipped to track the Narc homing signal cost twice as much as standard munitions."
MW3, MW4, and MW:LL all opted to have SRM and/or LRM ammo as the "upgraded" srm and lrm ammo that could auto-track NARC beacons, thus making NARC useful for its tonnage and competitive to use for varying situations and multi-functional with any SRM or LRM. Which is often why I have stated that for NARC to ever be useful for its tonnage it needs these multi-functional features.
Edited by General Taskeen, 19 July 2013 - 03:49 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users