I just thought I'd bring this to attention, even though im sure its been said before. But maybe a visual will help.
here's a shot of river city today:
http://i.imgur.com/vLpnzMR.jpg
Now here's a shot of the same area in river city, but in closed beta, before the cryengine update:
http://i.imgur.com/O4GWlgw.jpg
You see the difference? I'm wondering why River City (and all the maps actually) look worse than closed beta? There are missing shadows as you can see there, the shadows from the trees are missing...and the lighting seems to be non-existant in todays river city map, where in closed beta, it is bright and vibrant and actually noticeable.
1
River City [Before & After Shot]
Started by Shivaxi, Jul 23 2013 03:50 PM
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 23 July 2013 - 03:50 PM
#2
Posted 23 July 2013 - 04:06 PM
What are your game settings?
Are you using a customized user.cfg?
Are you using a customized user.cfg?
#3
Posted 23 July 2013 - 04:09 PM
No. Both these screenshots were taken with max settings. No custom config or anything.
#4
Posted 23 July 2013 - 04:40 PM
It seems there's a growing quantity of posts about this, and it is without doubt worrying that we don't have nearly as much eyecandy we should be having, at least when compared as before(too bad I wasn't at closed beta to see that at the time).
The game was undoubtedly prettier.
The game was undoubtedly prettier.
#5
Posted 23 July 2013 - 04:46 PM
Optimization for the people who use toasters instead of gaming PCs.
If they could make that sort of dynamic lighting a simple toggle switch that would be fantastic.
If they could make that sort of dynamic lighting a simple toggle switch that would be fantastic.
#6
Posted 23 July 2013 - 06:03 PM
Redshift2k5, on 23 July 2013 - 04:46 PM, said:
Optimization for the people who use toasters instead of gaming PCs.
If they could make that sort of dynamic lighting a simple toggle switch that would be fantastic.
If they could make that sort of dynamic lighting a simple toggle switch that would be fantastic.
This. It was to allow more players into the game with old machines.
I REALLY hope there are numerous settings for graphics control in UI 2.0. My PC is like 3 years old, but the processor and PSU, RAM were all like 1 month old at time of build, so my machine plays like an average build 6 month old PC now. I do need to upgrade my graphics card soon though, they have come a long way in the last year or so on GPU powah.
#7
Posted 24 July 2013 - 05:56 PM
As a CB player, this game has been on general DECLINE in quality. I used to be able to play on max settings in CB with at least 40fps. Now I have to run everything on low and OCCASIONALLY I'd get 40. This game looks bad, feels bad and generally is since then. Not to be called a doomsayer or whatever, just my opinion.
UI 2.0 will only working on the front end, IE: the mechlab. Nothing else.
Eldagore, on 23 July 2013 - 06:03 PM, said:
This. It was to allow more players into the game with old machines.
I REALLY hope there are numerous settings for graphics control in UI 2.0.
I REALLY hope there are numerous settings for graphics control in UI 2.0.
UI 2.0 will only working on the front end, IE: the mechlab. Nothing else.
#8
Posted 24 July 2013 - 06:29 PM
PanzerMagier, on 24 July 2013 - 05:56 PM, said:
As a CB player, this game has been on general DECLINE in quality. I used to be able to play on max settings in CB with at least 40fps. Now I have to run everything on low and OCCASIONALLY I'd get 40. This game looks bad, feels bad and generally is since then. Not to be called a doomsayer or whatever, just my opinion.
UI 2.0 will only working on the front end, IE: the mechlab. Nothing else.
UI 2.0 will only working on the front end, IE: the mechlab. Nothing else.
I think they may have mentioned somewhere it is also related to their DX11 implementation. Oh well.. Launch on September eh ?
#9
Posted 24 July 2013 - 07:56 PM
Good observation. I agree, bring back the detail!
#10
Posted 24 July 2013 - 09:50 PM
I expect this and more to come back once DX11 is implemented. Too bad there is no timeline for that.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users