blinkin, on 23 July 2013 - 10:40 PM, said:
explosions are also a dissipation of particles. to maintain a fusion reaction you must maintain very extreme pressures and temperatures into millions of degrees. heat a cup of water to 1 million degrees and see how much it wants to expand. if the containment fails then of course the reaction will halt immediately after, but the energy and pressures that are suddenly being released would easily equal a several kiloton explosion. all of the energy is already there in the extremely densely packed ball of energetic particles.
on a side note fission reactors have never had a full nuclear explosion. the explosions come from fluids and gasses becoming superheated and rapidly expanding causing large scale pressure explosions. if there ever were a full on nuclear explosion it would set off all the nuclear material inside or near the building and nothing would remain besides a crater for several miles.
you do earn cool points for at least doing some basic research on this stuff. i am not a physics professor and i do not have any special training or experience with any of this stuff, BUT i am sitting at a computer. my knowledge comes from worship at the altar of the all knowing google. i ask it questions and it leads me to the answers i seek (it created the youtubes to show us our flaws). there is absolutely no excuse for coming into a forum debate without at least a basic knowledge of the subject, that whole rant i posted came from about 10 minutes of online research.
Hopefully this isn't getting too off topic, but the dialogue is interesting.
Firstly, credentials wise - I am
not a Nuclear Fusion physicist. I do however work in the surprisingly related field of medical radiation physics, so my training/education has a fair amount of the core principles in it (same as Cellular Biologist needs to learn about gross metabolism despite it being largely irrelevant to their sub-field). So take that for what you will regarding the following:
The actual density of fusion fuel is surprisingly low considering the
physical container volume ( a few grams of fuel within ~1k m
3 in current reactor models), compression is achieved in a localised space within that volume by magnetic fields - an explosion of said particles would be highly dissipated by the time it reached the vessel walls (of course, the vessels in a Battlemech-sized fusion reactor would be rather a lot smaller than that, but one assumes a rather lower fuel requirement due to the likely lower power draw of a Battlemech compared with, say, a national energy grid). A vessel rupture would likely not produce that significant an explosion due to expanding fuel plasma compared with...
Magnetic containment explosion. I.e. a: magnet explosion and/or b: uncontrolled quench. The former occurs when gas is blocked from release and the cryostat chamber explodes under the internal pressure, and the magnetic apparatus explodes with it. A quench is a release of the cryogens, whereupon they violently convert from liquid to gas.
In the case of critical damage to a Battlemech's fusion reactor, the few grams of fusion fuel evacuating a punctured plasma vessel (presuming the vessel was punctured) would be, it is true, explosive. But you're likely to see more spectacular visual effects from:
a: Lithium fire from the cooling apparatus
b: Magnet explosion
c: Uncontrolled quench
http://www.youtube.c...e&v=JA7hzSBjM-Y
^ that is a
controlled quench of an NMR machine's magnets the uncontrolled version on magnets sufficient for a Tokamak-style fusion reactor would be rather more spectacular, I imagine.
So yeah. We have handy explanations for flashy fireball explosions, white gas explosions and combinations of the two, as alternatives to just keeling over dead (although it'd be nice if that still happened at least some of the time). What we don't have/want is KA-NUKE style mushroom clouds that damage other players.
Edited by Gaan Cathal, 23 July 2013 - 11:37 PM.