An Engine For All Seasons...
#1
Posted 27 July 2013 - 03:18 PM
Can anyone recommend similarly versatile standard engines. I'm aware of the comparative vulnerability of Xl's, but I just can't bring myself to give up the extra speed firepower and armor they can offer with the right mech and the right build...
#2
Posted 28 July 2013 - 10:25 AM
For standards, probably the lighter engines, 240-250, maybe a 275 and 300. Depends on the mech and the build. Heck, I hear a few people sticking 210 standard in builds (ugh, no thanks, I like to be able to get to a fight before time expires)
#3
Posted 28 July 2013 - 10:38 AM
#4
Posted 28 July 2013 - 10:42 AM
I'll say that you're largely right with the 300 and 330. The 300 is generally considered the sweet spot for engines, you get progressively less return for more investment as you go above 300, and of course smaller engines provide less speed, heat sinks, and maneuverability. I'd recommend keeping a 250 on hand if you're at all into mediums as it's proven surprisingly useful for a lot of my smaller 'Mechs, but it's not an essential thing.
#5
Posted 28 July 2013 - 10:43 AM
Edited by Broad5ide, 28 July 2013 - 10:44 AM.
#6
Posted 28 July 2013 - 10:51 AM
'Course, I'm the sort of guy who can't really see the point in using 'Mechs that aren't good with XL engines, or puts XL engines even in 'Mechs most folks say shouldn't have them, so I'm not a strictly unbiased source.
#7
Posted 29 July 2013 - 09:44 AM
XL255, 280, 300, 325, 340, 350
these are the sweet spots for me, i used to have an XL315 i occasionally used on my dragons and because it was the max engine size for Catapults and Jagermechs, but i ultimately found that the 300 was just a better fit on those mechs, and the dragon works better with either a bigger engine or the 300 as well.
i would say that i use the XL255, 280, and 300 in more than 75% of my heavies mediums and lights. with the exception of those lights and mediums that have an engine cap under 250, i never use an engine rated less than 250
#8
Posted 29 July 2013 - 07:41 PM
#9
Posted 31 July 2013 - 08:12 PM
#10
Posted 13 August 2013 - 12:41 PM
I'll put XL's in my cicadas, and as much as it pains me, I'll also put them in by BJs. I wish standard was more viable in a BJ, they seem to have exposed torsos for their size.
I see a lot of players that I think are nuts with XL's in very exposed mechs, like jagers. I just don't think the trade-off is worth it when you're side torsos are so very exposed and speed isn't absolutely essential to your build. Honestly, for me there's not a lot of difference between 74kph and 61kph in a heavy/assault.
#11
Posted 13 August 2013 - 02:23 PM
Shifty Eyes, on 13 August 2013 - 12:41 PM, said:
It depends on the model, but you get a combination of better turn speed, better twist speed, and better speed in general. that could be the difference between returning to base and defending, or getting capped. It could be the difference between closing on a sniper, or getting scrapped trying. It does make a difference in being hit while on the side, and it lets you circle your prey better.
That said, it's not essential for every build, and it may vary with your play style.
#12
Posted 13 August 2013 - 02:36 PM
250 STD
260 STD
300 STD
For XL, I tend to use these:
255XL
300XL
#13
Posted 13 August 2013 - 03:54 PM
For XLs, I've got a 250, 260, 280, 300, 325, and 375
I use all the XLs quite frequently, the standards are pretty specific use; for example, the 250 and 260 standards are only used on my Hunchbacks. The 300 for my Awesomes. The 325 and 330 are for my Highlander and Atlas.
For a go-to for most chassis, I'd put a vote for the 280 or 300. I've used the 300 on everything from Jenners to Trebs to Jagers to Victors
#14
Posted 14 August 2013 - 10:58 PM
#15
Posted 15 August 2013 - 09:05 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users