25 replies to this topic

[lpmagic]

module it, it's the only way to make the vets not swear up and down that it will ruin the game, there needs to be a minus, as well as the supposed plus, make us use an module slot and it should help out quite a bit

+1 vote for modulizing!!!

[Big STRETCH]

I like it sound idea. Gives a little takes a little as it should.

[ManDaisy]

I am opposed to the idea of making a module as that would do nothing for balancing the game. If someone "buys" a third person module you will end up with infinite abuse as long as they hold the module.

If someones buys a third person "drone" its not part of the mech, but a consumable. If they wish to use it they simply pay for the "drones" rather then have an infinite free supply.

With infinite switching back and fourth you get the peek over hill abuse as much as I want. If you limit the times you can switch back and fourth bewtween a match then it becomes a question of ok, which view am I comfortable in.

DO I abandon my drone and mov back to first person? Do I keep my drone deployed? With Consumable it becomes a much more tactical thought.

Edited by ManDaisy, 22 August 2013 - 11:16 AM.

[Bhael Fire]

Cherry Darling, on 03 August 2013 - 11:36 PM, said:

Split queues are happening.

Just not soon enough.

Hopefully they make the wait worthwhile.

[tucsonspeed6]

THis module idea is a great compromise. I say YES. Combined with the separate queues, there's no reason anyone should ever complain again.

[Straker]

You could even make it a consumable one use module. You basically get one switch.