14 replies to this topic

[New Day]

Anybody notice that they have deleted that topic. Guess Paul learned the definition of aggressive and decided to 'rectify' his mistake. Here is the feedback thread, and when you try the link at the top it leads nowhere.

[Khobai]

Gonna withhold judgement till Tuesday's patch. But there better be some aggressive changes

[Kyle Reece]

From the looks of it, it was merged to here.

This time they aren't out to get you

[New Day]

Kyle Reece, on 18 August 2013 - 05:57 AM, said:

From the looks of it, it was merged to here.

This time they aren't out to get you

Well this is embarrassing.

[Chavette]

Still, their current form of aggressiveness has only took the form of a single heat point for a single weapon system...

Edited by Chavette, 18 August 2013 - 06:23 AM.

[Lorcan Lladd]

Chavette, on 18 August 2013 - 06:23 AM, said:

Still, their current form of aggressiveness has only took the form of a single heat point for a single weapon system...

Well, in other times, that would have been more like 0.5 heat, so I still consider it an improvement.

[GODzillaGSPB]

NamesAreStupid, on 18 August 2013 - 06:05 AM, said:

Well this is embarrassing.

Nah, it's just paranoia, trained by coping with PGIs development characteristics for almost a year now.

[Tabrias07]

All but 4 of Russ's posts are gone, completely.

They're removing almost everything the dev's say so we can't quote them anymore about things that they said would be in by launch, that aren't going to be, apparently including the much awaited "aggressive balance changes".

Edited by Tabrias07, 18 August 2013 - 07:07 AM.

[Vassago Rain]

Tabrias07, on 18 August 2013 - 07:07 AM, said:

All but 4 of Russ's posts are gone, completely.

They're removing almost everything the dev's say so we can't quote them anymore about things that they said would be in by launch, that aren't going to be, apparently including the much awaited "aggressive balance changes".

I thought it got merged with some other posts? Maybe. Who knows anymore.

[New Day]

Tabrias07, on 18 August 2013 - 07:07 AM, said:

All but 4 of Russ's posts are gone, completely.

They're removing almost everything the dev's say so we can't quote them anymore about things that they said would be in by launch, that aren't going to be, apparently including the much awaited "aggressive balance changes".

Which ones are gone?

[Thuzel]

Yeah, they've been doing this sort of thing for a long time now. Any post or thread they seriously don't like gets "re-organized" including threads that have legitimate discussions.

The DHS fiasco is a good example. They deleted tons of threads because they made PGI look bad (e.g. called them on their crap), never mind that they actually had good discussions in them. It's just one of the reasons I gave up trying to be positive and contribute. They obviously don't want to hear it and half the time it's just going to disappear anyway.

Personally, I think PGI and the mods should have studied more history. "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." Applies here, a major reason why this community is so bitter.

[Egomane]

This doesn't look like a gameplay balance discussion to me...

[New Day]

Egomane, on 18 August 2013 - 08:18 AM, said:

This doesn't look like a gameplay balance discussion to me...

My bad, I forgot that gameplay balance isn't general discussion.

[Thuzel]

Case in point.

Don't like general discussions? Get rid of the GD forum area and then jettison whatever you don't like.

Ever notice how most non-balance issues that aren't critical of PGI are just fine in there, but the minute the thread goes south it's suddenly in the wrong area.

[PanzerMagier]

NamesAreStupid, on 18 August 2013 - 10:20 AM, said:

My bad, I forgot that gameplay balance isn't general discussion.

You and everyone else who wants to make MWO a better game.