Troggy, on 21 August 2013 - 06:23 AM, said:
MWO is not a big truck...
But, in all seriousness. This shows a pretty fundamental misunderstanding of 'cores.' They are not additional cylinders all pushing on the same drive shaft. It's more like multiple trucks assigned to the same task. Sometimes you have enough trucks to get the job done, and more trucks just get in the way. To really strain this analogy, what if it's the manufacturing facility (video card) or loading docks (RAM) that is the bottle neck?
Perhaps this should be programmed in, however this has always been the trouble with PC games, the hardware is pretty variable. It sometimes means figuring out how these things run on YOUR hardware. Therefore, if specifying only 4 cores fixes an issue, and you know that, consider yourself lucky.
--
Troggy
i agree, its like letting 9 women make a baby in a month...
Lusankya, on 22 August 2013 - 05:05 PM, said:
I would think with that much power you would easily get a steady 60fps. I'm running an i5 2500k with 8GB system memory and a HD 6850 at 1280x720 (720p) and I'm getting a steady 60fps at medium settings. One person I run with has a HD 7950 with an i7 ivy bridge CPU and he plays on max settings with no slowdown. Try different settings out and see what works and make sure your video drivers are up to date as well. Sometimes you can forget about that.
POOTYTANGASAUR, on 23 August 2013 - 05:17 AM, said:
I have an i5-2320 3.0Ghz and a 7750 HD and i play on max settings at 1080p so you can easily max it at that res considering your PC is much beefier than mine. I get 45 fps on max btw. You would probably get around 70 in 720p and 60 in 1080p.
im currently on high settings on my native res. and im still dipping to 35 FPS on a moshpit fight... i'll try overclicking the **** out of my CPU and GPU to get some gains