Edited by Redwo1f, 13 October 2013 - 08:54 PM.
Some Help With Building A Shadowhawk
#21
Posted 13 October 2013 - 08:38 PM
#22
Posted 14 October 2013 - 05:42 AM
Redwo1f, on 13 October 2013 - 08:38 PM, said:
Thats why I put the LBX10 though, could be a nasty brawler hit for another med or heavy but can chew lights a med range.
#23
Posted 14 October 2013 - 08:18 AM
Redwo1f, on 13 October 2013 - 08:38 PM, said:
^ this
If you got no BAP, you're not a light hunter.
#24
Posted 14 October 2013 - 08:30 AM
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...c46af210af7504c
Bear in mind that this is a quick throw together - exact location of ammo and such TBD.
Edited by Buckminster, 14 October 2013 - 09:14 AM.
#25
#26
Posted 15 October 2013 - 06:46 AM
Going to try a midrange build first with a L-laser and an AC10 plus an LRM5 for suppression and 2 Machine guns for end of match crit-seeking.
LRM5s are trash by themselves, but I've noticed players immediately break off whatever they're doing and head for cover when they get the incoming missile warning, until they figure out that it's only a five pack that can't really hurt them.
#27
Posted 15 October 2013 - 01:20 PM
Training Instructor, on 15 October 2013 - 06:46 AM, said:
Going to try a midrange build first with a L-laser and an AC10 plus an LRM5 for suppression and 2 Machine guns for end of match crit-seeking.
LRM5s are trash by themselves, but I've noticed players immediately break off whatever they're doing and head for cover when they get the incoming missile warning, until they figure out that it's only a five pack that can't really hurt them.
I'd swap out the LRMs and MGs for 2 SSRM (or an SRM6) with a ton of ammo and an AMS. I think that will work better.
Edited by Bront, 15 October 2013 - 01:28 PM.
#28
Posted 15 October 2013 - 01:32 PM
#29
Posted 15 October 2013 - 01:33 PM
Redwo1f, on 15 October 2013 - 01:32 PM, said:
So far the CT seems to soak a lot of damage. I've been doing pretty well with XLs. The height is a problem. I lined up next to a Battlemaster and they were practically the same height. :-\
#30
Posted 15 October 2013 - 01:39 PM
ShadowbaneX, on 15 October 2013 - 01:33 PM, said:
So far the CT seems to soak a lot of damage. I've been doing pretty well with XLs. The height is a problem. I lined up next to a Battlemaster and they were practically the same height. :-\
It looks a lot thinner though.
#31
Posted 15 October 2013 - 01:42 PM
Bront, on 15 October 2013 - 01:39 PM, said:
Oh, much thinner. Still a 55 tonner and an 85 tonner being practically the same height? That's not right. Also still annoyed about the max 3 JJs. Still I've been doing well with an ER LL, AC/10 & SRM6. I think I'm going to drop the SRM to a 4 and take an extra ton of AC ammot though.
#32
Posted 15 October 2013 - 02:14 PM
Also still thinking about stripping the left arm of all armor and putting a larger engine in but the shield is quite nice to have.
I did not deploy in that build so far, so this is still work in progress.
#33
Posted 15 October 2013 - 02:33 PM
Jules Vernes, on 15 October 2013 - 02:14 PM, said:
Also still thinking about stripping the left arm of all armor and putting a larger engine in but the shield is quite nice to have.
I did not deploy in that build so far, so this is still work in progress.
BAP would be nice to help those streaks out. Variant using the XL SHADOW HAWK SHD-2H
I havn't run it enough to know how much a liability the XL engine is yet, but for the 6 games I have played so far, average damage is 550, 3.33 KD.
Edited by Bhelogan, 15 October 2013 - 02:38 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users