Edited by Decus Bellator, 09 October 2013 - 07:12 PM.
The Unseen
#1
Posted 09 October 2013 - 07:11 PM
#2
Posted 10 October 2013 - 05:08 AM
The original variants of the Unseen are what HG is fight/suing/holding on to- despite some Japanese legal rulings. So we won't see the original Unseen unless PGI/IGP pulls off a miracle with making sure HG doesn't drop a frivolous lawsuit on them. Russ even stated in an interview that it would be extrememly difficult to get the Unseen in.
Edited by Lord Ikka, 10 October 2013 - 05:09 AM.
#3
Posted 10 October 2013 - 01:24 PM
Edited by Decus Bellator, 10 October 2013 - 01:27 PM.
#4
Posted 10 October 2013 - 01:35 PM
Decus Bellator, on 09 October 2013 - 07:11 PM, said:
HG doesn't have exclusive rights to the Unseen designs since they never had them to begin with. The Japanese courts made sure of that during the Big West v. Tatsunoko court cases in 2002 and 2006. Tatsunoko never had the rights to the designs, so the clause in HG's contract saying they do is invalid. This is why HG didn't use any derivatives of the Macross designs (character and mech) in Shadow Chronicles.
Check out what HG claims they have in their filing against Hasbro for the Jetfire Transformer.
http://www.courthous...ransformers.pdf
Edited by James The Fox Dixon, 10 October 2013 - 01:37 PM.
#5
Posted 14 October 2013 - 10:04 AM
The past is the past, those designs ended up in multiple shows, and as far as I am concerned it is time for redesigned unseen to rejoin the party. Like say the Pheonix Mechs coming MWO way.....
Edited by SuomiWarder, 14 October 2013 - 10:04 AM.
#6
Posted 21 October 2013 - 01:05 PM
#7
Posted 25 October 2013 - 05:58 PM
Marack Drock, on 25 October 2013 - 03:22 PM, said:
HG has ignored the complaints of BT fans for years, so don't look forward to melting their icy hearts anytime soon.
#8
Posted 26 October 2013 - 02:25 AM
Decus Bellator, on 09 October 2013 - 07:11 PM, said:
First and foremost, copyright protection (assuming here Harmony Gold does hold the rights, or at least believes it does).
Copyrights HAVE to be defended by the (assumed) copyrights holder, or else there are circumstances that can lead to their expiration.
It doesnt matter wether HG uses the designs right now or not; they did pay money for them once and as such assume legal ownership. I know it is popular to see the abundant legal conflicts in the business world, especially in the "intellectual property" field, as simple corporate malice, but much of it is a cause-and-effect reaction to existing laws and their loopholes.
Edited by Agentpony, 26 October 2013 - 02:26 AM.
#9
Posted 27 October 2013 - 09:27 AM
Agentpony, on 26 October 2013 - 02:25 AM, said:
Copyrights HAVE to be defended by the (assumed) copyrights holder, or else there are circumstances that can lead to their expiration.
It doesnt matter wether HG uses the designs right now or not; they did pay money for them once and as such assume legal ownership. I know it is popular to see the abundant legal conflicts in the business world, especially in the "intellectual property" field, as simple corporate malice, but much of it is a cause-and-effect reaction to existing laws and their loopholes.
Actually, copyright does not expire if someone infringes upon it. What you are thinking of is trademarks. If someone uses a similar trademark that someone else had before and if the original owner of the trademark doesn't fight they lose the trademark. The only way a copyright expires is through time and the copyrighted thing becomes public domain.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users