data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bad3/7bad3c72513b145e5c2493c75702cd028416046b" alt=""
Video Card Help
#1
Posted 27 September 2013 - 03:42 PM
#2
Posted 27 September 2013 - 04:22 PM
I would suggest saving your duckets (cash) till you can afford something in the 300 dollar + range and even then it may not be the video card that is bottlenecking your computer. If you post what all is in your computer people will be able to help more.
CPU
Graphics Card
RAM
Motherboard
Power Supply
With these bits of info we can help more.
Good luck!
#3
Posted 27 September 2013 - 04:22 PM
Just about any card from that list there should do you proud.
#4
Posted 27 September 2013 - 08:58 PM
#5
Posted 27 September 2013 - 10:12 PM
SirLANsalot, on 27 September 2013 - 04:22 PM, said:
Just about any card from that list there should do you proud.
I too was going to recommend a GTX 650, but Thanatos does have a valid point. Good performance in MWO is tied more to your processor than your GPU.
#6
Posted 28 September 2013 - 07:19 AM
Edited by SethAbercromby, 28 September 2013 - 07:19 AM.
#7
Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:18 AM
Edited by EyeDie I, 28 September 2013 - 09:20 AM.
#8
Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:29 AM
DEMAX51, on 27 September 2013 - 10:12 PM, said:
This is true, to a point. The graphics card does make a difference. Just replacing my graphics card and nothing else increased my average frames per second at maximum graphics settings by 30+ FPS.
I wouldn't recommend anything below a GTX 660. Lower than that might be okay for now, but they won't be in the future. Besides, MW:O isn't the only game out there, and a lot of them do depend heavily on the graphics card.
#9
Posted 28 September 2013 - 11:28 AM
Thanatos676, on 27 September 2013 - 04:22 PM, said:
That is not the case at all. I always go mid range on my video card with no problems at all. I built my current rig in late 2010 to eventually play Battlefield 3. If I can double my current frame rates for my gaming applications at the same price level I will consider upgrading. This is a very good rule thumb for anyone who doesn't need absolutely bleeding edge graphics.
Edited by Spheroid, 28 September 2013 - 11:29 AM.
#10
Posted 29 September 2013 - 12:57 PM
Missile Boat, on 27 September 2013 - 03:42 PM, said:
What are your current system configuration? The first part of your dxdiag would be helpful concerning this is your only post on the forums.
Edited by Tarl Cabot, 29 September 2013 - 12:58 PM.
#11
Posted 29 September 2013 - 01:16 PM
#12
Posted 29 September 2013 - 03:06 PM
@ the OP: Do a lot of research. If you don't know what you are buying, you can get a good deal and screw yourself. What looks like the same card for half the price turns out to be 1/3 the card. Might have the same chipset, but the other components are subpar etc. Read lots of reviews, and ignore any that come from people who can't spell or use decent grammar. They might not be idiots, but if it's a {Scrap} card, then smart people will blast it as well.
Download CCleaner and have it clean up your system. Defraggler is a great defragging tool, though the first time you run it be prepared to go to bed, then in the morning go to work to check your email. It doesn't take shortcuts and leave half your files fragged. Consider setting a new account on your system to login to for gaming. Use CCleaner to stop MS Office, Adobe, etc from pre-loading, kill all the updaters etc to free up more system resources for gaming. This has gotten me through a lot of Alphas/Betas with memory leaks etc.
#13
Posted 29 September 2013 - 06:40 PM
I have an old CPU and power nvidia GPU setup..
The fps can range from 100++FPS and tank to <25 FPS when certain things are happening on the screen.
Hoping that DX11 will indeed solve this problem.
#14
Posted 29 September 2013 - 07:14 PM
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?
Here's a list of very decent GPUs..If you go with a an HD7850 or higher you will most likely get very decent fps on high settings..Whatever you get also make sure its a GDDR5 and not a GDDR3..
I used to run a single Sapphire Radeon HD7950 Vapor-X and have been very happy with the HD series.A little more pricey then what you want but it runs 60 FPS on ultra high with V-Sync off.
Good luck with whatever you choose.
V/R
#15
Posted 29 September 2013 - 08:22 PM
In terms of overall performance versus an AMD card, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti is roughly in the same ballpark as the Radeon HD 7790.
For bang-for-the-buck at $150 I'd have to recommend the Radeon HD 7850 though. Newegg has the HIS H785F1G2M for $130 and the ASUS HD7850-DC-1GD5 for $145, $125 after rebate. Both also come with a choice of two games from the silver section of Radeon Rewards.
#17
Posted 30 September 2013 - 03:01 AM
#19
Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:40 AM
I think you can get this card for $150. Another plus (for me anyway) is that it's very power efficient, so you probably won't need to upgrade your power supply. My PSU is rated at 450W, and the 7790 works just fine.
#20
Posted 30 September 2013 - 08:15 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users