colsan, on 29 September 2013 - 08:19 AM, said:
So you are saying that the mech has a vacuum around it so the air doesn't touch?!
Good for you. I did "waste time" doing the math, and it doesn't work. If you aren't going to crunch the numbers yourself, you have no argument.
I was referring to the point about the temperature that the entire Mech would reach, and thus the pilot. Basically, if the reactor was really at 10000 K, it would first dump heat into the mech&heatsink system - which in turn loses heat to the surroundings. If the temperature of the mech/heatsink system is too high, the pilot's dead.
I'll just use that Newton's Law of Cooling here....so rate of heat transfer is proportional to the difference in temperature and the surface area. The mech system reaches thermal equilibrium when the rate of heat-in equals rate of heat-out. So AdeltaT is equal. Let's try 185K. And take the mech as a cylinder, and the reactor as a sphere. Height of the cylinder as 2r, Since the mech would probably have more surface area than a cylinder, I'll double it.
2*pi*r^2*2r(T-185)=4/3*pi*r^3(10000-T)
T=5092.5
You'd be in a mech with an average temperature of 5000K, and it'd be glowing in visible light! Even if it was only the heatsinks - they'd be a beacon to the entire map.
Quote
I know it exists. However, heat is pretty bad for anything magnetic - which it has to be in order to act as containment for a fusion reaction. That material's a polymer.
Quote
Okay, from here:
http://i.imgur.com/5Slu6.png
The Commando is about 9 meters in height, and about 4.725 metres wide. To allow for empty spaces, I'll halve the radius, so I can approximate the dimensions by a cylinder.
pi*(2.3625^2)* 9= 158 cubic metres
It weighs 25 tons. 25000/158= about 158 kg/cubic metre. Water has a density of 1000 kg per cubic metre. Even if we assume only a quarter of that volume is filled, so that 25000/(158/4)=634.5 kg/cubic metre, a Commando would float. So yeah, if physics applied, no underwater maps.
Quote
No; entirely wrong. So incorrect that I am having trouble coming up with words to describe it. In fact, in the future, when someone says something that is so completely wrong that it is going to take 5 times as long to correct as the initial statement, I'm just going to say that it is "Scurry."
That is the most Scurry statement I have ever read.
My fault on this one. I got distracted, and so fixated on Cournot and ideal materials so that I had it in my head for some reason that both water and air would be ideal. Dump that one into the trash can.
Just for my sake, would you mind pointing out exactly which section of the equation pertains to this? If it's not the entropy of the reservoirs, that is.
Quote
Then why don't we have unicorns? Wizards riding unicorns puking rainbows that melt our mechs?
If you throw away the basic laws of physics, then you open the door to whatever ridiculous thing comes up next.
Slippery slope, man. Certain laws of physics may be suspended in fiction, but it still has to pass the common sense test. And unicorns in sci-fi sure don't pass.
[color=#959595]
Quote
I considered that, but in MW4, you get a heat readout that goes up to about 10000; this also makes more sense, since 700 K is about 800 Fahrenheit, which would barely melt lead, much less the graphite that the heatsinks are supposed to be made of.
[/color]
For this one, why does the temperature need to be capable of melting lead? Just wondering.
Also, if all these things were correct, we'd still have to deal with how Inferno ammunition works in lore. Not to mention how much heat heavy ballistic weaponry produces.[color=#959595]
[/color]