Jump to content

Mmorpg: Review


87 replies to this topic

#1 Brachus

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 29 posts

Posted 30 September 2013 - 05:29 AM

Much like every other site I read, I don't always agree with their reviews, but this seems to be pretty fair and accurate. At least the reviewer played more than just that 1st handful of matches with the Cadet bonus.

http://www.mmorpg.co...shed-Robot.html

#2 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 30 September 2013 - 05:37 AM

Not a bad review. Not a good one but not a bad one.

#3 80sGlamRockSensation David Bowie

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The People's Hero
  • The People
  • 4,001 posts
  • LocationThe Island

Posted 30 September 2013 - 05:46 AM

Review I thought was pretty solid.


Funny, all these 'professional' game reviewers seem to identify the massive shortcomings this game has, yet we are all on some island. So strange.

#4 Krivvan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 4,318 posts
  • LocationUSA/Canada

Posted 30 September 2013 - 05:48 AM

View Postmwhighlander, on 30 September 2013 - 05:46 AM, said:

Funny, all these 'professional' game reviewers seem to identify the massive shortcomings this game has, yet we are all on some island. So strange.


Even the most "white-knighty" of players don't disagree about what shortcomings the game has. The only real difference is how important different aspects of the game are to people. The shortcomings the game has aren't all that significant to me. I understand that they are very significant to others.

#5 Daemir

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 64 posts

Posted 30 September 2013 - 06:06 AM

View Postmwhighlander, on 30 September 2013 - 05:46 AM, said:

Review I thought was pretty solid.


Funny, all these 'professional' game reviewers seem to identify the massive shortcomings this game has, yet we are all on some island. So strange.


It's all a matter of perspective you see. Most of us, with the reviewers, are on a huge continent that spans most of the world and PGI and the white knights are on a small little island, but in their view, it's us who are on, albeit big, island and should be ignored.

#6 Vassago Rain

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 14,396 posts
  • LocationExodus fleet, HMS Kong Circumflex accent

Posted 30 September 2013 - 06:09 AM

>Through it all, it’s the fans that are keeping a large part of MechWarrior Online going. Everything, from BattleMech loadout examples and workshops, to clan recruitment and group finding, is handled by a dedicated group of enthusiasts. While it’s great that these facilities exists, I can’t help but think that Piranha rely on their community to do most of the heavy lifting, choosing to ignore or delay adding features that would strengthen the game immensely.

Knocks it out the park. If it wasn't for the players, this game wouldn't have made it this far.

#7 Cybermech

    Tool

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,097 posts

Posted 30 September 2013 - 06:41 AM

that is a very well pieced out article with new pilot experience, pointing out some of the flaws that hopefully ui2.0 fixes.
it was near perfect - " high-spec Hero ‘Mech might give you an advantage in 1-on-1 battles"
not sure if its really valid at all, he might have gotten the feeling of it I suppose but its the only thing that is out of place.

after all those overwhelming and underwhelming articles this one is about spot as can be even though he missed out on some of the rage.

#8 Masterrix

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 194 posts

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:02 AM

View PostJoseph Mallan, on 30 September 2013 - 05:37 AM, said:

Not a bad review. Not a good one but not a bad one.



5.4 is a bad review. not a good, not a mediocre, its a bad one

in the game-rankings world, everything below 7 is bad.
no one would buy a game with 5.4, except hardcore mech fans

#9 Zolaz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 3,510 posts
  • LocationHouston, Tx

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:26 AM

PGI knows all of this ... the bad reviews, the player base upset with them, critics underwhelmed and that is why you dont see PGI on the forums any more. A shame PGI didnt put more effort into MWO.

#10 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:28 AM

View PostMasterrix, on 30 September 2013 - 07:02 AM, said:



5.4 is a bad review. not a good, not a mediocre, its a bad one

in the game-rankings world, everything below 7 is bad.
no one would buy a game with 5.4, except hardcore mech fans

If the rating is for 1-10, 5. whatever is average.

Edited by Joseph Mallan, 30 September 2013 - 07:32 AM.


#11 Brachus

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 29 posts

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:30 AM

View PostCybermech, on 30 September 2013 - 06:41 AM, said:

that is a very well pieced out article with new pilot experience, pointing out some of the flaws that hopefully ui2.0 fixes.
it was near perfect - " high-spec Hero ‘Mech might give you an advantage in 1-on-1 battles"
not sure if its really valid at all, he might have gotten the feeling of it I suppose but its the only thing that is out of place.

after all those overwhelming and underwhelming articles this one is about spot as can be even though he missed out on some of the rage.


I like to think that reviews should be intended for new players who do not yet have experience with a given game. While you are correct that he did miss out on the rage, I think that is better in a review, as a new player would not understand most of what has gone on prior to release to upset the player base.

#12 Heffay

    Rum Runner

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Referee
  • The Referee
  • 6,458 posts
  • LocationPHX

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:31 AM

View PostBrachus, on 30 September 2013 - 07:30 AM, said:

as a new player would not understand most of what has gone on prior to release to upset the player base.


You mean a small portion of the player base.

#13 Blackfang

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Blood Bound
  • The Blood Bound
  • 766 posts
  • LocationComing to a planet near you!

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:34 AM

At least all these official reviews are a massive shout to PGI to start focusing on the missing components that players are gagging for. Maybe we'll see an increase in pace towards those key features with a lot of the major game reviewers pointing towards those.

#14 Bilbo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 7,864 posts
  • LocationSaline, Michigan

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:36 AM

View PostBlackfang, on 30 September 2013 - 07:34 AM, said:

At least all these official reviews are a massive shout to PGI to start focusing on the missing components that players are gagging for. Maybe we'll see an increase in pace towards those key features with a lot of the major game reviewers pointing towards those.


Or maybe we'll see it once UI 2.0 is done. As they have said they needed it before they could implement those.

#15 Jestun

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:43 AM

View PostJoseph Mallan, on 30 September 2013 - 07:28 AM, said:

If the rating is for 1-10, 5. whatever is average.


No, it's not.

http://tvtropes.org/.../FourPointScale

While MMORPG.com's review is not on metacritic yet we can look at the average score given out by the 5 critics who's reviews are on there.

http://www.metacriti.../critic-reviews

Average score given by Gaming Trend: 80 - http://www.metacritic.com/publication/gamingtrend? filter=games
Average score given by IGN: 69 - http://www.metacriti...gn?filter=games
Average score given by Ten Ton Hammer: 79 - http://www.metacriti...er?filter=games
Average score given by GameSpot: 68 - http://www.metacriti...ot?filter=games
Average score given by Game Trailers: 76 - http://www.metacriti...rs?filter=games

IGN gave MWO an above average score, the rest all gave it a below average score.

5 is the middle point, it is not the average score.


:Edit:

The average score for MMORPG.com is 68 (6.8) - http://www.metacriti...om?filter=games

Edited by Jestun, 30 September 2013 - 07:46 AM.


#16 Blackfang

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Blood Bound
  • The Blood Bound
  • 766 posts
  • LocationComing to a planet near you!

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:45 AM

View PostBilbo, on 30 September 2013 - 07:36 AM, said:


Or maybe we'll see it once UI 2.0 is done. As they have said they needed it before they could implement those.

Well yes there is that, I somehow don't think they envisaged having to rewrite the entire UI from scratch when they first started the project lol, one of those minor set backs lol. I'm not complaining, I can wait as long as PGI needs I'm just happy to be playing a pretty Mechwarrior game ;-) the community run leagues and such like are tiding the wolf spiders over just nicely for now.

#17 MisterPlanetarian

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 910 posts
  • LocationStockholm

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:45 AM

View PostKrivvan, on 30 September 2013 - 05:48 AM, said:

Even the most "white-knighty" of players don't disagree about what shortcomings the game has. The only real difference is how important different aspects of the game are to people. The shortcomings the game has aren't all that significant to me. I understand that they are very significant to others.



Agreed. Although I think alot of the negativity stems from the fact that people are stuck with the same features, stuff like UI2.0 takes alot of development time and slows down other content/fixes etc.

That can be very frustrating at times but as long as the long term vision for this game won't change into something terrible I see nothing to get really worried about.

#18 T2k5

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 31 posts
  • LocationFinland

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:49 AM

View PostJoseph Mallan, on 30 September 2013 - 07:28 AM, said:

If the rating is for 1-10, 5. whatever is average.

That generally doesn't apply to reviews. The scoring rarely uses the whole scale in a logical way. Totaling all scored reviews on their site, the average score for mmorpg.com is 7,06 and median 7,3. Games that have received a score similar to MWO: Mythos, FF XIV: A Realm Reborn, Hello Kitty Online.

Edited by T2k5, 30 September 2013 - 09:22 AM.


#19 MechFrog1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 630 posts
  • LocationSouth Korea

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:50 AM

Fair review that hits on the common theme. Tragic.

#20 Johnny Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 9,942 posts
  • LocationDueling on Solaris

Posted 30 September 2013 - 07:50 AM

Would have got a higher score if there was elves running about with bows and arrows no doubt. :P That looks like a pro fantasy review.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users