

Sized Hardpoints: The Savior Of Clan-Tech
#41
Posted 21 December 2013 - 10:05 PM
#42
Posted 21 December 2013 - 10:11 PM
RandomLurker, on 04 October 2013 - 06:57 AM, said:

HOLLANDER SAYS "EAT THIS, ARTISTIC PERSPECTIVE!"
In reality though, the hollander just proves why hardpoint sizes would make sense. The Hollander was SPECIAL because it was a light mech capable of carrying a gauss. So if you gave hardpoint sizes, it would have a large hardpoint.
I actually made a fairly detailed system for how to implement hardpoint sizes, in a way which would be pretty simple to actually get in the game, but it was ignored years ago.
#43
Posted 21 December 2013 - 10:17 PM
Quote
Neither we need ghost heat any more.[color=#959595] [/color]
Whilst I agree with you on the Ghost heat Issue, the restriction proposed for omnimechs is lifted straight from the TT rulebook. I am happy with Clan Omnimechs having these restictions as a trade-off for meta-breaking flexibility in weapon loadouts. Also would be great if, with the new launch flow, omnimechs mechbay is still accessible right up to launching, whilst battlemechs (including omni's that have been modified, thus reverting them back to battlemechs, as per TT rulebook) are locked out of mechbay before joining the launch lobby.
#44
Posted 21 December 2013 - 10:29 PM
Gray 46rus, on 04 October 2013 - 07:10 AM, said:
Neither Raven nor Cicada can do that, but Hollander can. Do we have Hollander in MWO? NO. Do you know why? No need.
Trying to refute my statement, you just proved it. I feel OK with Hollander, but not with Gauss-Raven or Gauss-Spider.
Its just a damn graphical icon. get over yourself. In order to put a large weapon on a small mech a lot is sacrificed to do it.
I disagree with the OP. hard point sizes are not needed. it will only cut down on variety.
I did not vote because the pole was poorly written. Make it a simple and honest yes no selection.
Edited by Dirus Nigh, 21 December 2013 - 10:31 PM.
#45
Posted 22 December 2013 - 05:12 AM
Dirus Nigh, on 21 December 2013 - 10:29 PM, said:
How can you be so purblind? Clans are the ones who rely on variety. Poor fishes vainly trying to balance them against uber-variably IS mechs.
#46
Posted 22 December 2013 - 07:13 AM
Omen 46rus, on 22 December 2013 - 05:12 AM, said:
How can you be so purblind? Clans are the ones who rely on variety. Poor fishes vainly trying to balance them against uber-variably IS mechs.
What in the hell are you talking about?
#47
Posted 22 December 2013 - 08:27 AM
Dirus Nigh, on 22 December 2013 - 07:13 AM, said:
What in the hell are you talking about?
After all, we don't suggest to refuse all the Mechlab functionality, just limit it to give Clan mechs a chance.
Edited by Omen 46rus, 22 December 2013 - 08:27 AM.
#48
Posted 28 December 2013 - 02:51 AM
#49
Posted 28 December 2013 - 03:01 AM
Omen 46rus, on 22 December 2013 - 08:27 AM, said:
After all, we don't suggest to refuse all the Mechlab functionality, just limit it to give Clan mechs a chance.
Most mercenaries run custom builds. And refit packages are installied "in the field" (which of course do not include Endo-Steel or Ferro).
#50
Posted 28 December 2013 - 08:20 AM
Roland, on 21 December 2013 - 10:11 PM, said:
In reality though, the hollander just proves why hardpoint sizes would make sense. The Hollander was SPECIAL because it was a light mech capable of carrying a gauss. So if you gave hardpoint sizes, it would have a large hardpoint.
I actually made a fairly detailed system for how to implement hardpoint sizes, in a way which would be pretty simple to actually get in the game, but it was ignored years ago.
Maybe is time to bring it again.
This game real needs this. I mean REAL.
Anyone talking about that will cut variety is irrelevant. I will sey opposite. That will just add a real variety and flavor. Right now you have frankenstein without any shape running everywhare killing BT flavor and fun. I want to have panther, i want to have hollander, hunchy and whatever else mech to have hes special flavor and unicnes. So in reality that will just add some called variety.
#51
Posted 08 January 2014 - 12:31 PM
Thorn Hallis, on 28 December 2013 - 03:01 AM, said:
Most mercenaries run custom builds. And refit packages are installied "in the field" (which of course do not include Endo-Steel or Ferro).
#52
Posted 08 January 2014 - 12:39 PM
Dirus Nigh, on 21 December 2013 - 10:29 PM, said:
Oh my sides! The irony! (I realize this is not a correct use of "irony").
I think sized hard-points have their merits. I used to want them... I think there may be better ways to improve diversity though.
#53
Posted 08 January 2014 - 01:45 PM
Artgathan, on 08 January 2014 - 12:39 PM, said:
Oh my sides! The irony! (I realize this is not a correct use of "irony").
I think sized hard-points have their merits. I used to want them... I think there may be better ways to improve diversity though.
My comment was simple and honest. If your going to do a pole then mark the choices clearly and with out ********. That is a simple yes, no, other.
#54
Posted 08 January 2014 - 02:32 PM
Dirus Nigh, on 08 January 2014 - 01:45 PM, said:
My comment was simple and honest. If your going to do a pole then mark the choices clearly and with out ********. That is a simple yes, no, other.
I was laughing over you critiquing his post as being "poorly written" but you used the wrong version of "pole".
Pole: A rod
Poll: Something for gathering opinions
People often confuse homophones (words that sound the same).
I totally agree that the phrasing in the poll is biased and should be re-done though.
#55
Posted 08 January 2014 - 02:42 PM
Artgathan, on 08 January 2014 - 02:32 PM, said:
I was laughing over you critiquing his post as being "poorly written" but you used the wrong version of "pole".
Pole: A rod
Poll: Something for gathering opinions
People often confuse homophones (words that sound the same).
I totally agree that the phrasing in the poll is biased and should be re-done though.
Eh I could not remember which was which, so I just picked one and went with it.
#56
Posted 13 January 2014 - 06:41 AM
#57
Posted 13 January 2014 - 06:53 AM
The problem with adding hardpoint restrictions now: Hero mechs exist, specifically the Protector & Dragon slayer, and possibly the Firebrand depending on how you limit its ballistic ports. Both come with "large" ballistics and a PPC. Instead of highlanders you have hero mechs. Pick your poison.
Edited by 3rdworld, 13 January 2014 - 06:54 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users