I ran 6 matches in the Shaq before work today....it's too dam tall...hence the nickname ShaqOHawk. Let'shope they have better scaling for the Griffin and Wolverine, than for this FUBAR Mech.
1
Thunderbolt And Shadowhawk Size Comparison Screenshots
Started by Kaylos Thex, Oct 11 2013 08:01 PM
124 replies to this topic
#121
Posted 15 October 2013 - 10:40 PM
#122
Posted 16 October 2013 - 10:39 AM
Throbbinwood, on 13 October 2013 - 12:14 PM, said:
It boggles my mind as to why PGI can't get this scale issue right.
Why? It is the result of proven incompetence.
ECM.
Consumables.
3PV.
Mech scaling.
Sad, frustrating and disappointing.
dymlos2003, on 15 October 2013 - 08:27 PM, said:
Alright your argument is invalid cause you probably havent even used the damn mech
Wow. Think you just won this thread's Herp Derp Award for that bit of insightful brilliance.
Not sure why anyone is surprised anymore...this is just the latest craptacular achievement by PGI.
Shame too. I think the Shadow Hawk, (like the Kintaro, Trebuchet, and Quickdraw) looks great and has many positives...just not enough to offset the ridiculous scaling (AGAIN) that shouldn't be an issue in the first place. Glad I didn't pay real cash.
The T-bolt was sort of "meh" for me in concept, but seeing it in game...I think PGI nailed it.
I was looking forward to the Shadow Hawk, and I've seen some interesting loadouts on quite a few, mostly flaming corpses and burned out hulks, but interesting none the less. Too bad PGI blew the scaling and profile for it.
Edited by Burning Chrome, 16 October 2013 - 10:51 AM.
#124
Posted 28 October 2013 - 06:56 PM
Burning Chrome, on 16 October 2013 - 10:39 AM, said:
Why? It is the result of proven incompetence.
ECM.
Consumables.
3PV.
Mech scaling.
Sad, frustrating and disappointing.
Wow. Think you just won this thread's Herp Derp Award for that bit of insightful brilliance.
Not sure why anyone is surprised anymore...this is just the latest craptacular achievement by PGI.
Shame too. I think the Shadow Hawk, (like the Kintaro, Trebuchet, and Quickdraw) looks great and has many positives...just not enough to offset the ridiculous scaling (AGAIN) that shouldn't be an issue in the first place. Glad I didn't pay real cash.
The T-bolt was sort of "meh" for me in concept, but seeing it in game...I think PGI nailed it.
I was looking forward to the Shadow Hawk, and I've seen some interesting loadouts on quite a few, mostly flaming corpses and burned out hulks, but interesting none the less. Too bad PGI blew the scaling and profile for it.
ECM.
Consumables.
3PV.
Mech scaling.
Sad, frustrating and disappointing.
Wow. Think you just won this thread's Herp Derp Award for that bit of insightful brilliance.
Not sure why anyone is surprised anymore...this is just the latest craptacular achievement by PGI.
Shame too. I think the Shadow Hawk, (like the Kintaro, Trebuchet, and Quickdraw) looks great and has many positives...just not enough to offset the ridiculous scaling (AGAIN) that shouldn't be an issue in the first place. Glad I didn't pay real cash.
The T-bolt was sort of "meh" for me in concept, but seeing it in game...I think PGI nailed it.
I was looking forward to the Shadow Hawk, and I've seen some interesting loadouts on quite a few, mostly flaming corpses and burned out hulks, but interesting none the less. Too bad PGI blew the scaling and profile for it.
Perhaps, you don't driveyour mechs....well....
#125
Posted 28 October 2013 - 09:09 PM
2Cats, on 28 October 2013 - 06:48 PM, said:
SHADOW HAWK SHD-5M 61 32 26 1.23 49 40 1.23 13,180 48,299 06:31:02
I think you kinda missed the point here. I didn't post that because they're l33t stats, I posted that because buddy said I haven't even piloted the Shadow Hawk. That there is concrete proof that I had piloted the thing and they've gotten better since then. Actually, I just finished getting all the elites on my Shadow Hawks last night.
and uh, yeah, I still think it's a bit too tall. Despite that though, it's still a great mech. It's almost like a beauty mark.
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users