Is the artwork on the arms of these two chassis purposeful? When you place anything larger then a machine gun on the TDR-5S you get this giant black box and barrel that don't mesh with your mech. Same with the lasers on any of the TDRs arms. This also happens on the BLRs, and worse as even the default machine guns on the 1G and 1D don't even blend in. You get a box and a cylinder for all arm mounted weapons.
It is like you have two people doing the artwork. One person whom is dedicated to their job doing the base mech art, meshing the missle, gun ports, and laser ports into the internal part of the mech. Then its like someone comes along that doesn't care about his job and just sticks the outside weapons on to say they are represented on the mech. Yet it leaves you the feeling that if you saw the mech in real life, you would see the weapons held there with duct tape.
While I admit I wasn't the greatest fan of even say the weapons on the arms on the quickdraw they at least seemed to be part of the mech. But by them not picking up the underlying camo, or have little special boxes to hold them they just don't look right. Please say this is in error and producing high quality looks are and remain important to you.


Tdr And Blr Mechs, What's The Deal With The Bad Art On Arm Weapons?
Started by Ordate, Oct 21 2013 11:30 AM
No replies to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users