R Razor, on 21 November 2013 - 06:05 PM, said:
And they damned near won the war...........the point of war is to eliminate your enemies and their ability to resist............if firebombing his cities (or planets in this case) results in the end state of his being unable to resist then that's what needs to be done. Half assed ****** footing around doesn't get the job done, if it did there would still be hotspots around that constantly require attention. Agree with it or not it's the way it is. Now take your thinly veiled "you're a {Godwin's Law}" accusations and stick them where the sun don't shine.
What you're describing it total war, and while fairly effective at eliminating the machinery of government it does **** all at ending conflict. The entire fiasco degrades into asymetric warfare; and the injured populace never integrates and therefore places an unending strain on the "victorious" economy. The antivirtuous cycle leads to terrorism and other forms of violent extremism.
My point wasn't that killing civilians doesn't limit a nations ability to wage war, my point is that it limits the victor's ability to reap rewards and if the offender loses, they'll be vilified and punished for an excessively long time. Just look at the reaction the word "{Godwin's Law}" still has today more than six decades after their surrender.
... as a side note: the Germans were never going to "win" the war against Britain and Russia; best they could have done was force one or both into a cease fire. Once Russia entered the war, the writing was on the wall. Once the United States entered, it was over and Germany was a complete write off.