26 replies to this topic

[Deathlike]

Mister Blastman, on 11 November 2013 - 01:10 PM, said:

Well that much I won't debate with you or myself, either. I'm gonna get one too. Will I like them more than my Blackjack? Dunno yet.

Yes, that is a tricky proposition. I personally ran every BJ as an energy boat. The BJ-1 was the primarily medium jumping ballistic platform for a while... The SH is very much a jumping ammunition platform... so I don't think one will obsolete the other (besides their 10 ton difference).

Edited by Deathlike, 11 November 2013 - 01:31 PM.

[Fajther]

I love the concept of proxis so much that it almost makes me want to start a pool telling mwo to take their idea and implement it for the merc vs merc group play. Please sell your idea to pgi.

Edited by Fajther, 11 November 2013 - 01:37 PM.

[Kaldor]

Good info Multi.

+1 for you

[Shlkt]

It's interesting that the JR7-F is so overwhelmingly popular that the league charges almost double for it compared to the JR7-D (13.1 vs 7.4 million). I would not have thought 2 extra energy hard points would be valued at 6 million, 'specially when the JR7-D can at least mount some missiles to compensate and has an extra module slot to boot.

[Multitallented]

Ya it amazes me the extra costs people are willing to go to to get those meta mechs.

[Adiuvo]

The Jenner-D is just as viable as the Jenner-F too, it's pretty odd. The K isn't that bad either with arty/air strike.

[Vassago Rain]

Shlkt, on 11 November 2013 - 01:49 PM, said:

It's interesting that the JR7-F is so overwhelmingly popular that the league charges almost double for it compared to the JR7-D (13.1 vs 7.4 million). I would not have thought 2 extra energy hard points would be valued at 6 million, 'specially when the JR7-D can at least mount some missiles to compensate and has an extra module slot to boot.

Missiles don't hit, and lights have plenty time to cool off.