For Everybody Saying The Locust Is Bad...
#1
Posted 26 October 2013 - 06:16 PM
#3
Posted 26 October 2013 - 07:26 PM
You are failing to sell me this mech so far.
#4
Posted 27 October 2013 - 12:43 AM
#5
Posted 27 October 2013 - 06:29 AM
#6
Posted 27 October 2013 - 08:41 AM
SgtMagor, on 27 October 2013 - 06:29 AM, said:
Max speed for a Locust with a 190 engine is 169.3. For a Commando it's 171. Essentially means they're the same speed, as it's less than 0.5 m/s difference.
Locust has 138 armour (about 3.85 tons), ~6 tons for weapons payload and 8 crits free.
Commando has 178 armour (just under 5 tons), ~5.5 tons for weapons and 9 crits free.
So the Commando has 30% more armour, same speed, half a ton less for weapons and 1 extra crit when compared to the Locust.
Eventually the Locust will probably be able to hit 200 kph with an XL225. +4 tons for the engine -2 tons for internal heat sinks means 4 tons still for payload...that's not bad. No idea about the Commando's max engine as they keep changing it. It might not get too much faster as they get the netcode working better at high speeds.
#7
Posted 27 October 2013 - 08:50 AM
#8
Posted 27 October 2013 - 09:10 AM
Capt Sternn, on 27 October 2013 - 08:50 AM, said:
It's also nearly twice the tonnage (20 tons vs 35 tons)...the difference is made up in the Jump Jets.
It's like comparing a Cicada to a Shadow Hawk, a Dragon to an Orion or an Awesome to an Atlas. They're all the same tonnage class, but there's a huge difference between the bottom end of a class and the top end.
#9
Posted 27 October 2013 - 09:48 AM
ShadowbaneX, on 27 October 2013 - 08:41 AM, said:
Commando has 178 armour (just under 5 tons), ~5.5 tons for weapons and 9 crits free.
The latter is not accurate. It's almost 6.5 tons for weapons and 10 crits free.
Your assumption assumes Endo, FF, and DHS, max armor with the fastest engine and the required 10 DHS...
The Commando is still better than the Locust at this point in time.
#11
Posted 27 October 2013 - 09:57 AM
#12
Posted 27 October 2013 - 11:46 AM
Deathlike, on 27 October 2013 - 09:48 AM, said:
The latter is not accurate. It's almost 6.5 tons for weapons and 10 crits free.
Your assumption assumes Endo, FF, and DHS, max armor with the fastest engine and the required 10 DHS...
The Commando is still better than the Locust at this point in time.
You're right. I'm not entirely sure where that extra ton went missing.
#13
Posted 27 October 2013 - 03:56 PM
#14
Posted 13 November 2013 - 05:35 AM
Deathlike, on 27 October 2013 - 09:48 AM, said:
The latter is not accurate. It's almost 6.5 tons for weapons and 10 crits free.
Your assumption assumes Endo, FF, and DHS, max armor with the fastest engine and the required 10 DHS...
The Commando is still better than the Locust at this point in time.
It is way better
v
v
v
v
#15
Posted 13 November 2013 - 12:34 PM
#16
Posted 13 November 2013 - 12:44 PM
dal10, on 13 November 2013 - 12:34 PM, said:
That would be terrifying.
Teetering stacks of bad posts and cake, where weapons operate inconsistently because they encounter NERF pockets, surrounded by images of the banned and dispossessed.
Nightmarish to say the least.
#17
Posted 13 November 2013 - 12:45 PM
#18
Posted 13 November 2013 - 12:47 PM
#19
Posted 13 November 2013 - 12:49 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users